@StopPersecutingPeopl what the hell are you talking about? whats wrong with atheism? how does communism persecute truthfulness? do you have any idea what you're talking about? your sentences arent even coherent.
@BroadcastAds i think thats a presumptuous generalization. i think many of the contributors call for individual action as a solution to local/global issues, and also would not trust governments to do to intervene, or be naive enough to believe that politicians exist to make good things happen (unless of course keeping rich people rich at the expense of the majority of humans and other organisms is a good thing)
this dude is an evil dork i guess going into advertising. he actually has a free credit report commercial on his favorite videos. he likes that commercial. just a fag with an empty statement.
It seems like their message would call for less government intervention. Many mega-corporations become and remain powerful because of political and financial subsidies from the government. On a level playing field, many of these companies would be "creatively destroyed". There might be more choice, not less, because more businesses would be able to compete. We certainly wouldn't be driving oil-powered cars. Things would probably just cost a lot more as their true costs came to the surface.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
The whole premise of AdBusters is false. It believes that individuals can not be trusted to make decisions for themselves and that government intervention is needed to forcefully dictate how individuals choose to live their lives.
@StopPersecutingPeopl what the hell are you talking about? whats wrong with atheism? how does communism persecute truthfulness? do you have any idea what you're talking about? your sentences arent even coherent.
tayloroftheland 1 year ago
@BroadcastAds i think thats a presumptuous generalization. i think many of the contributors call for individual action as a solution to local/global issues, and also would not trust governments to do to intervene, or be naive enough to believe that politicians exist to make good things happen (unless of course keeping rich people rich at the expense of the majority of humans and other organisms is a good thing)
tayloroftheland 1 year ago
davero bravoProf !! l'ho sempre detto ke lei è il mio prof preferito!!!!!
corradomalandrino90 2 years ago
Bella presentazione!
NavBack 2 years ago
Complimenti Prof. Adamo, veramente una bella presentazione riguardo un argomento poco conosciuto e trattato !!!
19Francisco91 2 years ago
did you not know that adbusters is a anarchist magazine. You could not be more wrong with your commentary!
suntoucherr 3 years ago
this dude is an evil dork i guess going into advertising. he actually has a free credit report commercial on his favorite videos. he likes that commercial. just a fag with an empty statement.
MrWilliams1028 3 years ago
It seems like their message would call for less government intervention. Many mega-corporations become and remain powerful because of political and financial subsidies from the government. On a level playing field, many of these companies would be "creatively destroyed". There might be more choice, not less, because more businesses would be able to compete. We certainly wouldn't be driving oil-powered cars. Things would probably just cost a lot more as their true costs came to the surface.
waggabu 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The whole premise of AdBusters is false. It believes that individuals can not be trusted to make decisions for themselves and that government intervention is needed to forcefully dictate how individuals choose to live their lives.
BroadcastAds 3 years ago
ottima rassegna.. grazie..
mirkotuba 4 years ago