2011 Mustang GT 5.0L - 9.95@142MPH Stock Engine & Auto Trans

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
109,237
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 25, 2011

Evolution Performance, Inc. - 2011 Mustang GT C/S 5.0L 4V Automatic makes 652 RWHP and 577RWTQ with a Ford Racing/Whipple Twin Screw Supercharger at 12.5lbs of Boost. This car is geared more towards the Street/Strip group using 100% Street Components!

This car is owned by our close friend and customer Chris Cruz.

Modification List
-Factory Stock Coyote Engine
-Factory Stock 6R80 6-Speed Automatic Transmission
-Circle D Specialties Pro Series Billet Torque Converter
-Ford Racing/Whipple Twin Screw Supercharger @ 12.5lbs of Boost
-75lb Fuel Injectors
-Kenne Bell Boost-A-Pump
-L&M Dual 66mm Throttle Body
-123mm Carbon Fiber Cold Air Intake
-JLT Billet Oil Separators
-Evolution Performance, Inc. Custom Dyno Tune
-American Racing 1 7/8 Longtube Headers with 3" Collector and Off-Road X-Pipe
-Borla Catback Exhaust System
-Ford Racing 3.73 Gears
-Ford Racing Lowering Springs
-Evolution Upper Control Arm and Mount
-Evolution Billet Lower Control Arms
-Evolution Adjustable Panhard Bar and Brace
-Black Weld RT-S Wheels with Mickey Thompson ET Street D.O.T. Tires
-109 Octane Unleaded Fuel

Go To www.evoperform.com to purchase Cold Air Intakes, Evolution Performance, Inc. Custom Tuned SCT X3's, Superchargers, Longtube Headers, Axle Back and Catback Exhaust Systems, Off-Road and High Flow Catted X-Pipe's, Suspension Kits, Race Wheels, Tires, and Much, Much More! In-Stock, Same Day Shipping - Online Store Open 24/7 - www.evoperform.com

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Thumbs up if your a Ford fan ...

  • @huntergluck getting a new mustang is like buying a new cell phone, ur just gonna kick urself for not waitingin for the new model

see all

All Comments (432)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @SirKowalski666 wrong, then again all cars are different according to the actual driver. Um, leather was still an option in the previous gen mustangs, so was the 1000 shaker system, just like the new ones. Exactly, thats why Ford rips people off. Are you stupid? it has more options because whats an option on the mustang is STANDARD on the Camaro. Yes, you are very biased, we both are. one a GM guy, one a Ford guy, both on the two extremes.

  • @JDYDesigns Um....the 5.0 will do 25 mpg highway with an auto, 26 mpg with a manual AVERAGE. In fact the old mans mustang has LEATHER seats and a ridiculously loud sound system and it was only $31k. Who would buy a "fully loaded" GT for almost 50k when you could get a Boss 302 for just over 40k? All that shows is that there are more options available for the mustangs than the camaro. I'm not biased, I grew up on GM, that doesn't mean they're better in any way.

  • @SirKowalski666 for that guy. he is inexperienced, with biased thinking. there are stories like that everywhere. Wrong, a fully loaded Camaro SS is $43,750. a fully loaded mustang is $46,500. wrong again, the SS is 18/25, the GT is 15/23. who gives a fuck about visibility? you're buying a grown up car, for EXPERIENCED DRIVERS only. if you can't drive it because of visibility, you dont even deserve to drive a honda civic. the Camaro is fucking LEATHER. MUCH better than the mustangs cheap plastic.

  • @JDYDesigns "about 500 lbs heavier"?? You honestly think 30 foot-lbs is going to make any difference in acceleration in a vehicle being that much heavier? The FACT is, if the same driver were to make passes in both a manual Mustang GT 5.0 and a manual Camaro SS, his best pass in the Mustang would be at LEAST two tenths ahead of his best pass in the Camaro....not to mention you get a much better all-around car for less money. Better fuel economy, power/weight, visibility, quality

  • @SirKowalski666 lol tell real drivers that. the real fact is, the Camaro wins. it is not that much heavier, it's about 500 lbs heavier. The Camaro has a better weight distribution, mustangs are light in the ass. why would anyone believe you? your screen name has 666 in it. this is all fact, there is less tire spin, it gets better launches, and is faster in a 1/4 mile. I favorited a few videos of a 2SS destroying a GT500 around a track, AND a 1/4 mile. view, weep, think, then make an excuse.

  • @JDYDesigns Incase you didn't catch that, 30 more foot-pounds doesn't really mean anything in a car that's significantly heavier than a mustang. I don't care if you like the Camaro, that's your thing, but I do care that you're trying to bullshit me and everyone else reading, the fact is, the Mustang GT 5.0 blows the Camaro SS out of the water in every way and competes directly with the much more expensive BMW M3. These are facts, stop spouting stereotypical bullshit.

  • @JDYDesigns "Ford fanboy"?? I grew up working on plenty of GM's, building GM small blocks and big blocks, i've driven 80's firebirds/Camaros, impalas, a malibu, el caminos and a 2010 CAMARO SS and all of them felt dirt-cheap and drove like it. My old man got a 2012 Mustang GT (manual) four days ago and it's the most fun i've EVER had behind the wheel of a car by miles. Great feel, look, and sound. Better power/weight than the competition too, at a better price. The Camaro sucks ass.

  • @SirKowalski666 You're STILL too close minded. Get behind the wheel of both of them WITHOUT a biased opinion. wrong still, the camaro has about 30 more pound feet of torque, destroys the 5.0 in a 1/4 mile, because you don't spin your tires as much, instant launch, especially with lanch control. Now, back to the real topic- Ford owners are JUST like you- cocky, douche, young, asshole, and, now that I KNOW you can't drive, you have only proved you're the typical ford fanboy, get over it.

  • @JDYDesigns I'm sure you love to think that but sadly, that's not the truth. Truth is, it really depends on the driver. However, with two drivers of similar skill, the Mustang GT 5.0 will wreck the Camaro SS in every way. When you take shifting out of the equation, the Mustangs have even more of an advantage. 727 TORQUEFLITES are better than the new Camaro automatics. The Camaros are junk. Try dumping the clutch on a hard launch and you'll be replacing the IRS real soon kiddo.

  • @SirKowalski666 No, your original comment. I wasn't here yet. this video has nothing to do with it. yes, I know everything about you, you're a ford fan, therefore you are a prick, a douche, a dumbass and a bad driver...the only thing now is I need to see you drive. The Camaro has more lb-ft of torque, and, in a 1/4 mile, will destroy the mustang. it should get a better leap off the line, causing a gap, mustang can floor it but wont be able to catch up in the short 1/4 mile. get over it, its true

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more