Dr.Gerald Schroeder Genesis & The Big Bang Theory (1 of 5)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
18,684
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 11, 2009

http://www.geraldschroeder.com/age.html

This is not day = ERA theory


Today, we look at time going backward. We see 15 billion years. Looking forward from when the universe is very small - billions of times smaller - the Torah says six days. In truth, they both may be correct. What's exciting about the last few years in cosmology is we now have quantified the data to know the relationship of the "view of time" from the beginning, relative to the "view of time" today. It's not science fiction any longer. Any one of a dozen physics text books all bring the same number. The general relationship between time near the beginning and time today is a million million. That's a 1 with 12 zeros after it. So when a view from the beginning looking forward says "I'm sending you a pulse every second," would we see it every second? No. We'd see it every million million seconds. Because that's the stretching effect of the expansion of the universe.

The Torah doesn't say every second, does it? It says Six Days. How would we see those six days? If the Torah says we're sending information for six days, would we receive that information as six days? No. We would receive that information as six million million days. Because the Torah's perspective is from the beginning looking forward. Six million million days is a very interesting number. What would that be in years? Divide by 365 and it comes out to be 16 billion years. Essentially the estimate of the age of the universe. Not a bad guess for 3000 years ago.

The way these two figures match up is extraordinary. I'm not speaking as a theologian; I'm making a scientific claim. I didn't pull these numbers out of hat. That's why I led up to the explanation very slowly, so you can follow it step-by-step. Now we can go one step further. Let's look at the development of time, day-by-day, based on the expansion factor. Every time the universe doubles, the perception of time is cut in half. Now when the universe was small, it was doubling very rapidly. But as the universe gets bigger, the doubling time gets exponentially longer. This rate of expansion is quoted in "The Principles of Physical Cosmology," a textbook that is used literally around the world.

(In case you want to know, this exponential rate of expansion has a specific number averaged at 10 to the 12th power. That is in fact the temperature of quark confinement, when matter freezes out of the energy: 10.9 times 10 to the 12th power Kelvin degrees divided by (or the ratio to) the temperature of the universe today, 2.73 degrees. That's the initial ratio which changes exponentially as the universe expands.)

The calculations come out to be as follows: * The first of the Biblical days lasted 24 hours, viewed from the "beginning of time perspective." But the duration from our perspective was 8 billion years. * The second day, from the Bible's perspective lasted 24 hours. From our perspective it lasted half of the previous day, 4 billion years. * The third day also lasted half of the previous day, 2 billion years. * The fourth day - one billion years. * The fifth day - one-half billion years. * The sixth day - one-quarter billion years.

When you add up the Six Days, you get the age of the universe at 15 and 3/4 billion years. The same as modern cosmology. Is it by chance?

But there's more. The Bible goes out on a limb and tells you what happened on each of those days. Now you can take cosmology, paleontology, archaeology, and look at the history of the world, and see whether or not they match up day-by-day. And I'll give you a hint. They match up close enough to send chills up your spine.
Category: Education

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (338)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @jollyphm1

    What is your point, other than being a scoffer of Torah?

  • @adamatova

    I found your brilliant scholar to be someone with an irritating voice, who does not know how to speak or present information, and I was also disturbed by his dressing as a religious Jew, and yet he was quoting from astrology frequently. I fear that he also does not pay attention to the advice of our sages: "do not attempt to calculate the end."

  • WOW, talk about a streeeetch. no wonder this isn't acknowledged by anyone credible

  • It is obvious to anyone who reads Hebrew, that the first seven "days" were not days in our human understanding, since we count days in present time by means of the sun and the earth. There was no sun or moon in the first few "days" of the bible. You just have to read the bible word for word, and study the early translations into Aramaic. Rashi, Rambam, and Ramban also made decent commentaries.

  • Didn't match enough. BS

  • @jollyphm1 - how *wonderful* for you that you've collected all this information and how simultaneously sad that you haven't acquired the wisdom to go with that information. Typical of the data hoarders. Listen up and listen up once - because I am not going to repeat this. You want to be enlightened on what Judaism and Time is all about? There's a new vid out today by a brilliant scholar. Watch it and throw what you think you *know* to the wind. ZMbzdEexp9w

  • @adamatova I thought you had been a "Seeker of Smooth Things" as the Essenes called them back then.. I do study Jewish calendars, Dead Sea Scrolls, Codexs the whole lot... The truth is what your use as a Hebrew calender is an i a construct. from alter period.. You should like at Enochen calendar systems far more accurate, and at one time your "sect' of Judaism also followed... Book of Jubilees for example... BTW hows that Bar Kakhba and Brooklyn Messiah working out

  • @jollyphm1 - Keep laughing, because I'm laughing at you and this ridiculous insinuation, of which you have no citations, no searches but 2 random themes that have nothing to do with TIME as it is known in the Jewish calender. And what - are you one of those idol worshipers who believe a Jewish man hanging from a piece of wood is your *god* to boot? Nuff said. Fail!

  • @adamatova I AM COMPLETE ROFLMAO.. Its a simple historical footnote well known to scholars and theologians.

    Bar Kakhba Revolt, 240 years, Akiba Go google it on our own...

    Just like the Birkat HaMINIM is a direct assault on Yeshua his the followers of the Way..... Cairo codex discovered in 1924 look that up also...

  • @jollyphm1 - Prove it and cite your sources.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more