A Pentagon Hosing; 911 Firefighting 3

From 911 NBC just after 6:00pm.

You can't fight a real fire with fake water.

We were never shown any real firefighting at the pentagon on 9-11.

911 was an inside crime. It continues.

The only thing real on 911 was TV fakery. Everything else we were shown on TV was false.

Thanks and a tip of our hat to Joe Craine, YouTube martyr.

11 161 175 2001 7 9 9-11 9/11 911 93 aa aa11 aa77 abc air airline airlines alan american attack attacks bbc blast building bush C cbs cd center charges cheney chung church cintron clouds cnn commission connie controled controlled courchesne craine damage debris demolition dew disney edna engine evan express fairbanks fake fakes fakery fema financial fire fires firefighting foam fox fuselage gear george ghost ghwb giuliani ground gwb herbert hero heroes heros image inside interpretation jennings job joe judy ktla landing lawn lines martyr murder murray nbc nist no one parts pentagon peter plane planes plant psyop rector report rescue rescuer rescuers rotor rubble rules rummy rumsfeld shaped september september 11 seven shanksville smoke sylverstein tire today trade tube tv two ua ua175 ua93 united walker wallace weather west wfc woods world wtc wtc1 wtc2 wtc7 you youtube zero

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• 911
• 9/11
• September
• 11
• FOX
• NBC
• AA77
• pentagon
• AA
• 77
• flt
• Joe
• Craine
• inside
• TV
• fakery
• crime

[nameofthepen]

Yes, I would say that fake streams of water would be the logical thirst-quencher for fake fires. :-)

[fresniak]

"I have over 350,000 viewers who, like you, could find no errors in my videos."

The word "Error" does not mean anything,

Implying a thesis from stating an hypothesis may not contain any logical error, it may be formally correct, but if the hypothesis is weak and unclear there is a substantial Error.

[CNN911Fakes]

fresniak

I have simple rules. I give people opportunities to present their evidence.

Asserting the same unfounded opinion is not presenting evidence. It is spam. Don't bother.

Give a link. If it is a video, give the YT link and I would be happy to meet you there.

Everything shown on TV is doctored. TV fakery is every single day in every single news story on every single station.

Your assertion requires belief that they didn't lie on 911.

[CNN911Fakes]

fresniak

Don't use vulgarity on my boards. I will leave this comment as it shows who is who quite well.

I have been criticized by far more competent than you. I have over 350,000 viewers who, like you, could find no errors in my videos.

Shills, like you, pretend not to see what is actually there (the window looks open!?) or creat cocamamy theories as to why it could be expected given the official story of 911.

I present facts. I don't block. No garbage can stick on me. Keep tossing!

[fresniak]

2. No there isn't.

What you mean there isnt? Care to explain maybe??

It was shown on tv, you can say it was doctored, but there is a video. So dont say bs

[fresniak]

It's much better evidence than your shit of video here is showing..

You have no theories then you are definitely a disinformation shill. Your videos try to ridiculize the "No-fakery" evidence, that people like Simon Shack and others have put together with so much sacrifice. You're really a shill.

[CNN911Fakes]

fresniak

I asked for evidence links, not your opinions.

1. "looks?" Hardly evidence.

2. No there isn't.

3. rummy always lies

4. So what?

I have no theories. I only have evidence that I cross reference

You have opinions that are unfounded.

[fresniak]

1) The shape of the hole and internal damage looks like could have been made by a missile

2) There is a camera showing some object like a missile going very fast into the pentagon wall and causing an explosion. If they could fake it , why didn't they do it properly, by showing an airplane instead?

3) words slippery by Rumsfeld (interview Oct. 12, 2001 for Parade Magazine)

4) I am sure there are others but don't recall them right now

So what is your theory about the explosion at the pentagon?

[CNN911Fakes]

fresniak claims

1) It is dubious that the window is closed (at least for me)

2) It is dubious that the water is going into the window

3) Even assuming that it was indeed closed, the fireman probably didnt see it and sprayed anyway.

Wow, the video shows all three, so I guess I am stuck.

I will delete all further comments along this line for a number of reasons;

it is trolling.

it is spam

it is an obvious lie.

Go away.

[CNN911Fakes]

fresniak

OK, let's go thru the shill/infiltrator 2-step.

Pls provide a link to evidence of a missile at the pentagon.

Please do not refer to the rummy interview where the rumour was started as rummy never tells the truth.

You're right, this video deals with the narrow subject of one faked spraying at the pentagon.