Booster Rally part 9

Steve's second run - Smack off: 15.01mpg

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Booster
• run
• Smacks
• HHO
• Hydrogen
• Hydroxy
• generator
• gasoline
• fuel
• alternative
• energy

[nilent]

Assuming that this test was honestly done then you have about a 10% increase in mileage using really primitive (compared to what would be possible if cars were engineered from the ground up to utilize this tech) systems.

It seems fair to project that fuel efficiency improvements of 25% could be realized if the MIT cobalt catalytic tech were added to this and the whole thing was properly integrated (as opposed to jury rigged).

Again, assuming this was legitimate/honest; you've done a great job!

[EletrikRide]

Thank you! There is no assumption of my integrity. I am The One And Only Smack. The name Smack is synonymous with honesty. I also have 3 other people with the same integrity who were there and witnessed this carefully done test. For those who still do not believe in me, I challenge them to perform the same tests to verify my claims for themselves. My confidence in my integrity knows no bounds - I stand behind my claims 100%.

E

[EletrikRide]

Huh? I have no idea what point you are trying to make.

[wallbangicus]

So, if engines should not be run that rich, what is wrong with making them leaner? Thats the part I didn't get. If the booster is designed for low heat situations, and electrolysis works better at high temperatures, then would not heating the booster/running as much current as is available (the alternator will spins x number of times no matter how much current is drawn) act as an energy potentiator + the lowering of the gas input (it doesn't need as much to do the same thing) get better mpg???

[EletrikRide]

You are confused. Cat's are band-aids for the inherent design flaws written into the engineers books purposefully to REDUCE fuel efficiency. Engines should not run this rich in the first place, and auto manufacturer's know this. So does the federal gov. who writes the laws governing emissions that manufacturer's are tied to, and the EPA. It's a giant scam - and the consumer (You) is the victim.

[wallbangicus]

Well, could you please tell me??? lol I don't know what you mean. Engines are made to run richer to run the cat converter (I think someone said that earlier in this series too) I'm confuzzled I guess 0.o

[EletrikRide]

Again, not needed for this particular application.

[wallbangicus]

I have to concur with svtscracer. Leaner is leaner regardless of the application, but it is kind of important when going for efficiency.

[EletrikRide]

This is not a problem, so there is no need to make any adjustments with this application.

[svtscracer]

ok if you imput your hho before the mafs the computer will not be fooled into thinking you have a air leak this will help to lean you air to fuel mixture also you will need to "trick" your o2 sensor so that it does not say that you are running to lean and richen your mixture as the computer is programed to do this automaticly you can do this by correcting the voltage coming from the o2 sensor that way the computer will lean out your a to f mixture and get far greater efficiantcy more milage