Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Questioning Steve Jones

This video asks questions about Dr Steve Jones - why does he prefer to talk about Ad Hominem attacks rather than Physical Evidence? Why does he misquote research? Why does he dodge certain issues?  
 
Customize

More From: adjuk

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

41 ratings
Sign in to rate
2,242 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Download This Song:
Advertisement

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (97)   Options

Loading...
fubarczar (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
The person who posted this shows a lot of ignorance. Some obvious facts this video maker obviously doesn't know:
The skin of the planes are Aluminum but not the frames, engines or many other parts or the plane.
Those 767s weigh more than 400,000 lbs with fuel and passengers.
There are many videos showing planes flying into the towers, & none showing a laser firing at it, lol
cashmny78 (3 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Since this videos come out Steven Jones has found unreacted super thermite all thoughtout the WTC dust proving explosives were used. Its in a peer reviewed scientific journal now.

You're an idiot and your video is shit.
AFFLICTED99 (5 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
It is very obvious this video is just taking fragments from Steven Jones reports,editing,and twisting his words.
smitty121981 (11 months ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
very sad video, Steven Jones is making great headway in the research, why would you want to tear him down? By the way, faint circles in a Jackson Pollock debris pile don't mean shit!!
willyD200 (11 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Please, keep it simple until another investigation begins. Go with known evidence people can easily understand. I'm not opposed to your theories just your timing.
streakingcameraman (11 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
It's fucking funny that Idiots NO PLANERS (which you fucking idiots are the dumbest truther group possible) are arguing with another group of truthers who believe that bombs, not the planes and fuel that they agree was there, knocked them down.

I love watching retards fight.
Machida356 (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Awesome video analysis!!!!!!!!!!!


Directed Energy Weapons
naard (1 year ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
a piece of wood flung by a tornado (at around 300mph) can embed or pass through harder materials, such as brick. impact energy makes a difference as to what a material can resist. doesn't seem like much of a stretch for an aluminum wing to shatter or push in sections of steel when it has 500mph or so of momentum behind it, as well as the mass of the airplane itself. that's a good amount of energy in that impact.
merged (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
jones is hiding the fact that mini nukes were used to destroy the WTC.....
his theory that termite did it, he's lying....
termite cools down relatively in a short period of time
sawzaw203 (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
There were no planes on 9/11!! Controlled Demolition was not was brought down the towers and does not account for the physical enomalies that occured there; unique burns on cars and trucks, concrete and everything inside including people turned to dust except for all the paper you see on the streets, also, the "bathtub" holding back the water from lower Manhatten. Also, Dr. Jones attacked no planers in the beginning of this video while claiming that no-planers attack other 9/11 truth groups.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.