Federer vs Agassi - 2004 QF UsOpen (Part 5-8)

No description available.

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• Federer
• vs
• Agassi
• -
• 2004
• QF
• UsOpen
• (Part
• 5-8)

[federerbestclass]

Roger is true class. true king. love Roger

[satishsatishiyer]

Where is Part 8-8

[zzasdadsdk]

@Globox822 I am really pleased with the current form of federer and I strongly believe that he would win at least a major next year. No doubt Tsonga and Del Potro have potential to win majors and for that matter one should not underestimate Tomic and Raonic... but to be honest they do not stand anywhere near to big 4s. As far as competition is concern I don't think the competition during the time of agassi was any smaller compare to current level competition (Dont forget Sampras, Kuerten etc).

[Globox822]

@zzasdadsdk few months ago I said Feder is better then ever, and look at him in last couple of months. He even said so himself few days ago. The thing is competition is much stronger these days and fed lovers don't want to admit to that. Anyone of top for could win 3 GS next years (for example), and guys like Del Potro and Tsonga can beat anyone. You guns like Tomic and Raonic might explode next year. It's not easy these days.

[zzasdadsdk]

I don't know why people are attributing decline of federer to his age...he is still in perfect condition.he is playing big shots. Only thing which he is currently lacking off is the confidence .I do not understand why he could not hold his nerves during big points.I never saw him losing match after having 2 match points.he should take some inspiration from Aggassi who was world no. 1 at the age of 33 years and 4 months.I believe that he has the potential to win at least 2 more majors.

[thisnamealsotaken]

@AandresHernandezZ LOL if i was beating a guy at that age i would be called a king too. stop riding federers dick so much man, its making u blind.

[syncroneyes]

Wow, they don't have this kind of angle anymore ):

[randykarmakum]

@mousavsm watch and analyse again. Nadal hit like 0 backhand winners against djokovic, always land short. Djokovic place low shots to make nadal bend down, there is nothing mental about it. He always have the game to win now that his endurance improved this is only normal. His game against nadal never changed since 2007. Its natural that clay courters' slower topspin stroke and western grip has weakness against knee level balls

[mousavsm]

@randykarmakum I respect your opinion but I disagree. Djokovic beating Nadal is more mental than physical. Nadal has just made more errors against Djokovic when compared to other players. Djokovic has also gotten better. Federer losing to Nadal is partially mental, too. Nadal is in his head. But, to add to that, Nadal is better on the baseline than Federer. Also, go loook at Nadals backhand progression over the last 3-4 years. Then come tell me it's gotten worse and not better (no way).

[randykarmakum]

@mousavsm no, nadal's bh has deproved since 2008. 80% of nadal winners come from his fh now which is the reason djokovic beats him easy. Furthermore all clay courters afraid low level flat balls, djokovic kept pounding on his thigh(most shots to center of court) if u analyse their match. The only reason federer lose because his loopy bh cannot land at nadal's thigh, yes only federer fh side able to do that but not quite enough. If he had a flat bh then he completely dominates rafa.

[AandresHernandezZ]

Agassi was playing a legend, and a king.

[Sallar21]

GO AGASSI