Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

THE UNDENIABLE UNIFYING FRAMEWORK OF 9 11 John McMurtry

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
3,170
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 25, 2008

http://stj911.org/members/index.html

About Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice

Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice (Scholars) is a non-partisan organization consisting of independent researchers and activists engaged in uncovering the true nature of the September 11, 2001 attacks. Scholars emphasizes a scholarly and civil approach to inquiry. While researchers affiliated with universities comprise a portion of the group, membership is not limited to individuals with academic affiliations.

We welcome all who are interested in helping to achieve a full understanding of the events of that tragic day.

Scholars was founded in 2006 following a successful series of conferences and events examining the attack of September 11, 2001 using the scientific method and stressing the analysis based on large bodies of evidence -- particularly relating to the destruction of the World Trade Center.

Scholars and its website are currently governed by an ad hoc committee, which formed following a general consensus reached among the membership of the original Scholars for 9/11 Truth regarding governance, website content, and civility. In the near future, an election will be held to select a steering committee. Administrative positions will last for one year.

Who We Are

Scholars is a group of independent investigators working towards exposing the truth behind the 9/11/2001 attacks. Currently, our membership is comprised of more than 600 individuals, from around the world, including scientists, engineers, architects, psychologists, emergency workers, and educators.

http://stj911.org
http://INFOWARS.COM
http://WEARECHANGE.ORG
http://PRISONPLANET.COM

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • McMurtry is a brilliant man. We need more people who calmly discuss these issues, and less of the extreme yelling idiots who have muddied the waters of modern critical thought. Yes, I'm looking at you, ALEX JONES.

  • @5147848amp It is obvious what happened. Three building brought down with explosives, drone or other missile type object sent in Pentagon, plane shot down over Pennsylvania, shot down by military fighter jet. Done deal. That is what happened. Killers on the loose. And then instant Patriot Act and "war on Iraq." PNAC published this whole thing in 1999 or 2000, "what is needed is a new Pearl Harbor." The international power structure used military tactics / propaganda on the US people.

see all

All Comments (17)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @ukpolemic yup Osama said he did it , but over 3 years later , he was so proud that he couldn,t speak for 3 years hahaha , the only people your story supports is Israel, big shock lol .By the way Osama didn,t have a human shield , he didn,t fight back, didn,t have a gun on him,the white house staff didn,t sit around and watch a live stream from a navy seals cam. Your one of those people who believes in fairly tales and regurgitates main stream and political satire regardless of facts

  • It always amazes me how people will reach to find motive in places there was none. Osama Bin Laden himself said the goal was to show vulnerabilities of the USA (who they believed to be supporting oppressive regimes in the Islamic world...partially true) to spark an uprising in the middle east whereby citizens would overthrow their leaders and pave the way toward a new Islamic caliphate. As we've seen, this has indeed happened, but not necessarily on his timeline, nor the way he wanted it.

  • unification, contextualization - to me, those aspects of a theory matter the most. the more powerful a theory is in those (that) aspects the more convincing i find that theory. anyway, McMurty FTW.

  • @Joeey

    Thanks, as I said, I've come across this information before. What I'd like to know is if there is, outside NIST, any information backing up the government line that World Trade Centres 1, 2 and 7 were destroyed by fire.

  • @Joeey

    Yes, thanks, I've come across this information. I was more interested in hearing information that supports the official line that 2 planes brought down 3 buildings in N.Y.C. And as of yet, no one has offered me anything. I'm suspicious of anything official.

  • @truthIsStranger If you believe that it was an inside job, you're mad...What's the endgame? To go to Iraq and NOT take their oil? Why wouldn't the gov't do more of these attacks?

  • @5147848amp If you are interested at getting to bottom of thing, look at the obvious: three buildings brought down with high tech demolition, some object sent into Pentagon leaving a 14' hole. Plane shot down over Pennsylvania. And a bunch of Israeli Mossad arrested in the NYC area and a pre-packaged "bin Laden" story ready to go reported 9AM morning of 9/11, reported by same government official who made a bunch of workers take Cipro resulting in many injuries from dangerous drug to "protect"

  • @truthIsStranger "Settle down skipper, that's so September 10th of you". I have the right to say what I like. And so do you, and judging by your abuse to others, you exercise that right with vigour and colourful language. HAPPY NEW YEAR.

  • @TheAndrew668

    Good god, are your parents brother and sister?

    That was not "Al Qaeda," Al-Qaeda is Arabic for "The toilet." It's an inside joke made to tease Arabs with the obvious truth - the best way to foster the real terrorism that America wants, is to make sure they realize all of the other attacks are done by your agents. This way the truth infuriates your enemies while the lies soothe your workers.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more