Cricket - Two runout in one ball

Match of history.

Category:

Sports

Tags:

• Two
• runouts
• on
• one
• ball

[mindscat]

@newbedfordsox In the first place the keeper was holding onto the ball, trying to work out who they could run out. One of the batters may have been scoring lots of runs so they wanted to get him. So he threw it to the other end to get him out, but to make sure they'd at least get one wicket, they threw it back to the keeper. So they ran both ends out but only the first wicket counts and it's dead after that.

[newbedfordsox]

Please clear me, if a batsman is out then the ball will be declared dead automatically and another batsman cannot be out in a deal ball. Am I missing here something?

[villafan001]

@newbedfordsox Yes, you are correct, however the decision of 'out' was not given because the umpire wished to use the video review, therefore the ball was still 'live' for them to attempt the second runout - once it was confirmed by the third umpire that it was out, then anything subsequent to that is redundant because the ball is then classed as dead. It's just that in TV cricket the umpire doesn't need to give an instant decision, so play can continue, then later they go back and review.

[niranjan2100]

@mindscat hii

[villafan001]

@bombs347 Sorry, and you are...?

[Blackhoundrise]

lol

[jameshigz]

@pdanushka oh wow yeh haha... how'd i missed that i dont know

[pdanushka]

@jameshigz

At 00.24

[jameshigz]

Now hold on wheres this double run out? I can not see the wicket keeper actually hit the bails or stumps he goes for it then stops and throws it at the bowler?

[bombs347]

@villafan001 DUMB FUCK!!!! LMFAO!!!!!

[ranjith89mail]

@geniusgugu i want know what is your country ?respect the other country people because they r also human beings .don't u mother ,teacher, at least your country teach basic manners .shame full country

[shashankrajkodesia]

@stonersid The first batsmam was given out . .

[heelfan1234]

@stonersid As soon as a wicket falls, it's a dead ball so only the first run out counts as a wicket.

[villafan001]

@stonersid You're quite right, yes.

[stonersid]

@villafan001 ive never seen this b4, id love to know what the correct decision is...

Ill have a wild guess that 2 batsmen cant be out in the same instance, please tell me if im right, or as i fear talking bolox :O)

[yottskry12]

@villafan001 I apologise. I hadn't read the whole thread (there was too much of it), and your post came at the top, which is why I replied to it.

[villafan001]

@yottskry12 If you'd taken the time to actually read the thread that my latest comment was part of you would appreciate that I was perfectly aware of that - the point I was making is that assuming the batsman is NOT OUT, the ball is still live to attempt the second run out, contrary to someone who suggested the ball was dead after the first run out attempt.

[yottskry12]

@villafan001 It worries me that a cricket umpire doesn't know that as soon as a player is out, the ball is dead. It is not possible *at all* to get two players out from one delivery. What's happening in this video is that they're breaking both ends to guarantee that they get one of them out.

Law 23.1(a)(iii) says the ball becomes dead as soon as a batsman is dismissed. Therefore it is not possible for both batsmen to be dimissed off the same ball. It has nothing to do with breaking the wicket.

[meekobansal]

I feel sorry for the 17 ppl who got run out the same way....

[PureAgainBOF3]

@villafan001 dumb fuck

[villafan001]

@PureAgainBOF3 How very eloquent.

[PureAgainBOF3]

@villafan001 dumb bitch