Creation vs Evolution Timeline

This shows the time line of 2 competing world views.

http://www.watchtruth.com

Category:

Education

Tags:

• 6000 years
• millions
• brave new books
• bnb
• Creation
• Evolution
• NWO
• Big Bang
• Earth
• Age of Earth
• truth
• Religion
• Christianity
• Gospel
• Salvation
• Animal
• Human
• Image of God
• Discover
• Nothing Exploded
• Population Reduction
• Ted Turner
• Georgia Guidestones
• Cap and Trade
• Cows
• Mars
• Time
• Pluto

[JinxOz]

This guy is an idiot to even try to compare these so called "two world views." TWO!?

One view is a mythical anecdote, and the other is a fact.

I can't believe there are people out there that think we were created when there is evidence to the contrary right in front of them.

Religion is a parasite and is no longer needed.

[wowsdrawkcab]

LOL

[jisaid08]

This man is mentally ill....I feel sorry for people trapped in this mind set.

[10gacituao]

Just want to know, if there were just two elements in the beginning, how do we have all these other elements?

[minidry2]

That is a miss conception, "Get something from nothing, that's a good deal for them I guess".

The big bang theory is that to start with there were 2 hydrogen atoms that had all types of energy (eg. Force, gravity ect.) in one small space, and that they come in contact and expanded faster then light. So that there was always something, because something cant come from nothing. But christian belief that god was always around. He was created from nothing.

[kelbykross1]

@SpiritWorldBlog besides where jesus is the son of the volcano god Yahweh and a virgin gives birth to a baby....

how about where in kings, pi is missed completely when calculating for circles.

maybe how the walls of jericho and the other cities destroyed in that military campaign were destroyed centuries apart, or fell on their own accord?

[SpiritWorldBlog]

@kelbykross1 It's taken Figuratively and Literally.

IT HAS LAYERS! THE MORE YOU GROW THE MORE YOU LEARN.

Google: The Bible Decoded Vip

Also, Where do you think its literally wrong?

[kelbykross1]

@SpiritWorldBlog the bible is meant to be taken literally. and it is literally wrong.

[kelbykross1]

come on guys, science is really hard! don't make fun of them if they don't understand geological time.

[SpiritWorldBlog]

@Aerostoth The Bible is meant to be taken literally. It is figurative in some places but they are easily detected.

The original OT Bible was in Hebrew. The New Testament was in Greek.

The Bible is found in different versions and different languages so anyone can cross examine them.

The Cosmos tell the History of Jesus Chris (Visually) and in the exact correct order.

The Bible also tells the History of Jesus Christ but with more detail. (Written)

Go back to the link, It should be updated.

[Aerostoth]

@SpiritWorldBlog If you are a Creationist, then I think it's safe to assume that you interpret the Bible literally. Please explain how you interpret the differences between the original bible, and not the english knock-off (I'm not bashing, I'm trying to understand where you're coming from).

I looked at what came up, but I didn't find any explanations. It mentions things but never explains them; the justification is missing (or maybe I missed it- if so, please redirect me)

[SpiritWorldBlog]

@Aerostoth Do you not know? GOD wrote the Bible in the Stars/Cosmos

Our Galaxy before it was even written in a Book/The Bible. -So is not just a book.

Google: The Stars of the Cosmos Explained

or check my videos for the link.