Gay Arab Anarchist to bike across U.S.

Streamed by Dave Ridley in United States. More at http://qik.com/ridleyreport Qik is the fastest way to upload videos to YouTube from your mobile phone. Find out more at http://qik.com.vv Gay Arab Anarchist to bike across U.S.

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• ron
• paul
• free
• state
• project
• new
• hampshire
• nh
• staters
• liberty
• live
• or
• die
• libertarian
• gay
• arab
• anarchist

[coketimemdear]

i bet he ends up in a town that is tolerant of gays and Arabs, but HATES anarchists..

[vaguelyhumanoid]

@yammyspeed13 You can still keep what you earn with private property.

Unless you mean "earn" as in through wage labor... that would end.

[vaguelyhumanoid]

@materazzi85 Because both gays & Arabs are oppressed.

[materazzi85]

you're just an anrchist.....why you show off your sexual or national orientation?

[yammyspeed13]

@juliaisafilmbuff123 Not as slim and narrow as the replies you have given me to my questions. Why don't you just try speaking for yourself and quit avoiding the issue here. With that in mind, I ask you once again, how do you have a Stateless system where no one is allowed to keep what they earn? How does this not imply the initiation of group force against an individual? And don't give me all that 'somehow' stuff. If I wanted that, I would just go and read all books you recommended.

[juliaisafilmbuff123]

@yammyspeed13 I think you need to read some traditional anarchist writings since your understanding is incredibly narrow. Study Proudhon, Bakunin, Kropotkin, Goldman, and others. Anarchists have ALWAYS been opposed to capitalist systems in any form because capitalism creates illegitimate authority and hierarchy.

[yammyspeed13]

@juliaisafilmbuff123 Seems that you would still need State power to accomplish the end result you seek. I personally don't know how anyone could survive without the right to keep or dispose fruits of his labor. And I mean who would want to take over the job of building factories or anything else if this was mandatory? The State??? If so, it don't sound much like anarchy to me. Unless your talking about all unchecked masses that would run wild and free into your life.

[juliaisafilmbuff123]

@yammyspeed13 Capitalism, by definition, implies force and coercion (i.e. private property not intended for active personal use such as a factory you own but do not work in only belongs to you and not the workers you've hired working in it because of some kind of coercion). I would suggest reading classical anarchist texts to understand it better.

[yammyspeed13]

@juliaisafilmbuff123 So, what the difference between socialism without state power to initiate the use of force and capitalism without government power to initiate the use of force? Would they both mean the free trade between parties of consenting individuals?