the Cherokee language

Your logic is astoundingly bad. So is your history.

Hmm. How is facts "bad logic"? and I know MY history. You can continue to stay ignorant if you want I dont give a crap.

Let's examine what you are saying. Since, you claim, that Negroids and Amerinds presence in the Americas predate the arrival of Caucasoids, their interbreeding does not constitute a dilution of either blood line? What if it were the case that it was Caucasians and Amerinds there first? Would their interbreeding consititue a dilution?

Sir, it's a fact that Native Moor (black) people were in N. America before caucasian people. And it is common knowledge that NATIVE American Indians were. I'm not trying to get all into it, because my comments will get blocked I'm sure. But I have no idea what you're trying to say.

What I am saying is this: Negroids and Amerinds are of two distinct genotypes. They are not of the same race. Of course, Athapaskans are distinct as well. So, any mixture of DNA is a dilution of the ethnic grouping. I am sure that you are famiar with Kennewick Man, so what does this say? I am curious where you got your information that "Moors" were in the Americas all along. Are you familiar with the work of Jeffrey Goodman?

No I am not and as I web search him, can't seem to find anything telling me who he is and what he has to do with anything. Sorry, not to discredit him. Oh and I got my research from other African-American historians and authors that say the same thing. Caucasians were not in America first, that is not the truth. Just like they did not peacefully take the Indians lands and territory. But I do agree that theres really no such thing as a person of 100% race especially in the USA.

Check Amazon for his work "American Genesis." Who are these African-American historians? Caucasians have been in the Americas longer than people think. It may well be discovered that they have been there for millenia longer than previously thought. We know that peoples all over the world have been displacing others for a long long time. The Comanche did it, the Cherokee did it, the Aztecs did it, the Zulus did it. They all did it violently as well.

Mhmm... but they didn't turn a whole country into their own with the affects lasting centuries, including slavery in all of it's forms lasting long after abolition. I appreciate you stating your case, but my logic is not bad and neither is my history. A lot history books around the WORLD fabricate and rewrite events for the victor/conqueror, so they're not always giving you all the facts. Maybe ur defending them bcas ur white? When Africans have done wrong I will say they are wrong too.

How do you know? We know that slavery was practiced by all peoples that we know about. The first slaves brought to the America's were white. White slaves were owned by whites, blacks, and red people. The Celtic people ruled Europe then were forced off the continent. Slavery is still practices in Africa. It was not brought there, they have been doing it for millemnia. As an historian I am well aware of secret histories.

Tremendous video!