Kevin Randle talks about UFO debunkers

A clip from an interview with researcher / author Kevin Randle back in September, 2001, in Kevin's hometown of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, for the documentary Stanton T. Friedman is Real. In this heretofore unseen segment, Kevin talks about the difference between true skepticism and debunkery / true believer-ism.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• ufo
• debunkers
• skeptics
• debunker
• skeptic
• kevin
• randle

[lllwindrunner]

Key up the following, research & form a valid theory 1947 Twining Memo 1949 FBI Memo, UFOs Top Secret 1950 Hanford AEC document 1952 CIA (Chadwell) Memo 1953 Oak Ridge Memo 1954 Maxwell AFB Emergency Memo 1955 Pepperell AFB Radar-Visual UFO tracking 1966 Minot AFB UFO Landing Memo 1967 Malmstron AFB Memo 1969 Bellender Memo 1975 NORAD and USAF UFO documents 1976 DIA Memo (Iranian Jet fighter incident) 1978 State Dept. Memo on Bolivian UFO crash 1981 Halt Memo 1990 DIA documents on Belgian UFO

[kor314]

indeed science is about proof. However when someone refuses to see the proof that is right in front of them, because he or she (in this case you) is dead set on not believing (or at least taking an unbiased look at said proof) the science factor seases to exist.. in such a case it stops beeing science and becomes onrdinary debunkiorism :)

[greg357159]

Debunkers are "PAID" government professional LIARS... supposedly professional men and women who at one time received funding by the government or are still funded at their University or Corporation ie: Bell labs. These LIARS prey on and hope the general population will heed what they say because there "Psychologists" "Doctors" "Lawyers" and alike.. They all know that Aliens are here and have been for millions of years. The truth is out there if only you research it.

[ZachVMNTX1]

The truth will stand up to the most extraordinary skepticism . I feel that most UFoligists draw the line between skeptics and debunkers at who is just skeptical and who proved them wrong. The existence of other life in the universe is almost certain . However we need to be realistic if a race really found a way around the universal speed limit of light and traversed millions of light years would they really be interested in sticking a probe up a rednecks ass? Or fucking us apes? I Hope not.

[lllwindrunner]

Anyone has to consider the possibility that your strongest UFO evidence can be thoroughly confiscated if you find it and try to get it to your local news agency because they will want to fact check that material with higher authorities before running the story. Our U.S. government might have some big concerns about letting your alien evidence go out into the world because of all the major impact it would have on not just us but them, politically and other ways.

[lllwindrunner]

Airline pilots, police officers and military pilots and radar specialist have been reporting UFOs and not aliens. They want UFO's investigated. You should too because this involves air safety and national security. You entrust these people with your life and yet your government is denying your consideration by not having open investigations and so that's what's bizarre and no matter if it's alien craft or not. Skeptics research objectively and honestly but that's not the debunkers style at all.

[wulfshelmut]

@Joeyjumpoff1 Sure they have. Suuure they have. lol Whatever makes you feel better and sleep better at night. lol

[theydonotfly]

This is bizarre. There is no such thing as a "debunker" according to this definition given by kevin. I am a skeptic since I am looking for the truth and yet so many people have told me I'm a debunker because i refuse to see the "truth?" Jesus. There is NO scientific proof of the existence of ET craft in our skys and no amount of "hey look at all the evidence" changes that. If it were proved beyond a doubt the entire scientific community would get behind it. it hasn't. Go figure.

[Joeyjumpoff1]

@kor314 Most cases have be explained & have been down to earth. The conspiracy theories just are from the movies, people want to believe because its just a fantasyof theres

[kor314]

@Joeyjumpoff1 if you truely think that is what i said, i strongly suggest you read it again.. i didn't say you dont assume something.. i merely stated that if you know where to look and make an effort, there is plenty proof worth studying :)) this does not necisarily mean you can proof existence of 'alien UFO's' beyond reason of a doubt, however it does mean there is evidence which needs (and deserves examening..

:)))

[Joeyjumpoff1]

@kor314 what are you saying ? I m a debunker becuase I dont assume something that changes everything about Life & the galaxy.

Thats a huge step & I'm very gullible