OBSOLETE VERSION 9/11: Caught on Tape: WTC Building 7 Damaged by Falling Debris from Twin Towers

NEW VERSION AT /watch?v=nEgPNNcdtu4

This ABC News Video from 9/11 shows damage to the upper floors of WTC7, from debris falling from the collapse of the WTC twin towers. Far greater damage down near the street is NOT visible from this angle with smoke. However, this proves that WTC Bldg 7 was struck by debris from the WTC twin towers collapse. SEE UPDATED VERSION http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p3_wCKwPAlo

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 9/11

[SheepAsleepWakeUp]

Dude even if WTC 7 was hit by anything, it still shouldn't have collapsed without explosives involved, just like the world trade towers did.

[misstoth123]

i was only a couple of years old wen this happened,,,

very sad

[superjump01]

@irival say your saying that there was absolutely no presence of fire at all in building 7. So then countless hours of footage and thousands of photos of pillars of smoke rising from the base o building 7 are what then ghosts? Where there is smoke there is ALWAYS Fire.

[cancanbiker]

@chefpetey

watch?v=upk767RMYsM

Certainly! No other bomb explains the fuel smell in the lobby (which was not jet fuel from the crash 80 stories up) and the aluminium particles in the dust. Thermite makes a molten like reaction which we didn't observe in the core. Like you said we saw the steel turn literally to dust. That's what this bomb is designed to do. It's in the hands of front companies for the cia like Wackenhut & the WTC security was run by a similar company called Kroll.

[chefpetey]

@cancanbiker I will go one step further and say that it was probably the same explosive medium that was used in the Shanksville shoot-down. Frankly I think Thermite...in any form...is too "old school." Assuming the concrete, rebar, structural steel, 2 jetliners with people and luggage were not defective...WHAT in this world coulda turned them to DUST in one shot? Go back and research Neutron weapons which, oddly, fell off the scope in the 80s

[cancanbiker]

@chefpetey

sorry for coming across like a a**hole. I guess we all look at events and draw our own conclusion. When it comes to 911 I feel like I have seen enough evidence to be convinced some institutions had enough knowledge about the attack to benefit from it in every conceivable way hence its another inside job.It's hard to imagine a building with more steel & better design than the WTC. The design made it easy to covertly access the core columns and place explosives secretly via elevators

[chefpetey]

@cancanbiker Sir: Just offered that as "what if?" Stated it as fact because of the character limit. You MUST ADMIT it makes sense when you consider that NOT ONE DEBUNKER has mentioned this as even a possibility. Maybe all the buildings needed was a minor seismic event or errant hurricane. Watched a 1 year old building fall in its own footprint in Bethlehem, PA. Very cheap Re-bar made with NUCLEAR WASTE in Mexico turned all the concrete into Swiss Cheese at thesame time. Catastophic failure

[cancanbiker]

@chefpetey

Please do yourself a favor and read about the twin towers design before posting such absurd comments. Your "faulty steel" explanation still doesn't explain how the core collapsed completely from fire throughout the 90th floors.

Contrary to the FEMA's assertion that the core columns were freestanding, construction photographs clearly show that large horizontal beams cross-connected the core columns in a three-dimensional matrix of steel.

Simple question: Have you seen the core?

[skatetop2]

i have no idea why i searched this i was just bored but this makes me sick