These toys are terrible. Every-Single-One! The Chrome on the phaser isn't movie accurate and it can give away your position easily due to the shiny-ness of the Chrome. I hate the tricorder. Look at the medical tricorder or the TNG tricorder from older series' and tell me this one is better. because if you say this one is better then you are mildly retarded. The communicator really does look like a power ranger toy. Damn these really dissapointed me. i have all three and I want to sell them.
the comunicator is the only one that does not disgust me, the phaser is crap, and the tricoder make no sense with ANY of the series, thanks JJA for ruining the Star Trek franchise!
I disagree regarding the tricorder. The original looked a little more functional, even if it was a very '60s design. There's no screen and no compartment to hold a hand scanner like the original. This one is also smaller than the 24th century equivalent -- so much for progress! :P
The round front of the phaser looks a bit similar to the phase pistol, but that's where the similarities end IMO.
I disagree about the new phaser design. The one in the movie isn't chrome, it's a more matte gunmetal-grey, fortunately. The red and blue tips are still a bit cheesy, but not as bright as this toy either.
I think I'll buy two of these toys -- one to keep in packaging, the other to airbrush to make the colour more accurate to the movie.
Not sure why your comment is getting some negatives. It's just an opinion. I gave a thumbs up.
These newer trek toys are interesting design wise but there's no way they top the classic landing party equipment of the 1960s.
carnivalofsouls2047 8 months ago
i have the phaser and the communicator, but the tricorder didn't look too good. the phaser is worth its money though, its so cool!
effbyrne 2 years ago
These toys are terrible. Every-Single-One! The Chrome on the phaser isn't movie accurate and it can give away your position easily due to the shiny-ness of the Chrome. I hate the tricorder. Look at the medical tricorder or the TNG tricorder from older series' and tell me this one is better. because if you say this one is better then you are mildly retarded. The communicator really does look like a power ranger toy. Damn these really dissapointed me. i have all three and I want to sell them.
AmazingStarTrekker 2 years ago
Seriously man, the Tricoder, that is all it does? They look like lame power ranger toys,,, except for the communicator
Disco234jockey 2 years ago
the comunicator is the only one that does not disgust me, the phaser is crap, and the tricoder make no sense with ANY of the series, thanks JJA for ruining the Star Trek franchise!
laosfederico 2 years ago
nope
AzuraRain 2 years ago
It's a FAAAAKE.
Zebonka 2 years ago
I disagree regarding the tricorder. The original looked a little more functional, even if it was a very '60s design. There's no screen and no compartment to hold a hand scanner like the original. This one is also smaller than the 24th century equivalent -- so much for progress! :P
The round front of the phaser looks a bit similar to the phase pistol, but that's where the similarities end IMO.
jovantheun1337 2 years ago
I disagree about the new phaser design. The one in the movie isn't chrome, it's a more matte gunmetal-grey, fortunately. The red and blue tips are still a bit cheesy, but not as bright as this toy either.
I think I'll buy two of these toys -- one to keep in packaging, the other to airbrush to make the colour more accurate to the movie.
Not sure why your comment is getting some negatives. It's just an opinion. I gave a thumbs up.
jovantheun1337 2 years ago
the tricorder looks like the hand scanners from enterprise
jakmrnd 2 years ago