HIV is a Hoax

This is a response to a video clip circulating around my friends in the medical field, which was on Oprah.

If you're interested in the video I mention in my commentary, here it is: http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/video/ (It's the first video on the page, although all of them are relevant.)

...Oprah herself is a whole other issue.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• oprah
• hiv
• aids
• diagnosis
• hoax
• cd4
• dissiden
• duesberg
• gallo
• research
• medic
• fauci
• CDC
• pharma
• retrovir

[lightfdar]

No one is going to like this but you are most likely correct. I think it was "House Of Numbers" that did it for me. When started checking it for myself I realized this was complete bullshit even the test to test for HIV is false since there is no test that can prove you even have HIV, since the test don't test for HIV the test for the antibodies but the funny part is you can have quote unquote HIV antibodies and not have HIV <_< its sad but everyone once again is being bullshited

[TheLogicJunkie]

@lightfdar Thanks for speaking up.

[payooful]

@V78thgz rofl the drugs ofc, just like most people die to drugs nowdays

[V78thgz]

If HIV/AIDS doesn't exist ...then what killed Freddie Mercury ?

[shaney76us]

I've watched the House of Numbers. YES: I believe the gov needed a new cash cow. BUT: No matter whre or hw it originated, HIV/AIDS is REAL & kills millions evry yr, meds or nt. TRU: developed vs undeveloped countries' tests/criteria r dif. YES: I believe majority of thse n Africa r dy'n more frm extreme poverty. BUT: Here n the US & other developed countries I hve seen & cont 2 see the progression n thse tk'n meds vs thse who dn't. (2 b con't)

[KombiPode]

Wow you still around man? Well said about the fucking hoax of HIV they should be thrown in prison for this scam.

[synnr666]

It's on the internet, it MUST be true!

[marcus8902]

what ever you say man

[TheLogicJunkie]

@PolitcalIslam YES. That's it, EXACTLY.

And, in fact, Peter Duesberg does in fact say that a retrovirus HAS in fact been isolated, but that nothing has ever shown, by the precise and accepted standards of science, that it causes AIDS. Hence, calling it a "human immunodeficiency virus" has been dishonest and wrong from the very beginning. Therefore, calling it "HIV" has been misleading and false.

THAT is the whole point here: so much of this disease has been a slick word game all along.

[PolitcalIslam]

@TheLogicJunkie If there are antibodies, the retrovirus exists. Whether of not the virus causes the disease is actual question.