NIST WTC Response 2: Thermate

moving right along...

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 9/11
• wtc
• thermite
• thermate
• controlled
• Demolition
• Shyam
• Sunder
• NIST
• report
• c-span
• truth
• questions
• think

[charcoaljohnson]

I've seen special needs children give better fake presentations than this.

[kkkaldav]

@LordDavidVader Well, legovideoman, re your analysis of my speculation: 1. The "seems to " was about the box column's sides containing the thermite, and I don't think many would doubt that the sides would contain it since the only way it could get out would be for it to melt its way out, and by the time it's done that the job's done, duh! 2. I did explain how the thermite/thermate could be placed in the columns. It was high-tech stuff though: you cut a hole in the column and pour the powder in.

[kkkaldav]

@LordDavidVader The entire interview isn't going to explain how Roberts could possibly know that the stuff he held in his hands was the very stuff from the very window - he doesn't even try. The point though, is that it's ridiculous to think that anyone could have accurately identified it given the subsequent collapse of the towers. And since Roberts must know this he must know he's lying - even assuming he actually held anything in his hands, as opposed to fabricating the story in its entirety.

[LordDavidVader]

@kkkaldav "Seems to" you? Nice science. how about you demonstrate this. or demonstrate the silent explosives inside the columns. Given the number of engineers supposedly in the truth movement this should be very easy to do. And while you're at it explain how this thermate/explosive could be placed into the columns. And get those engineers to produce a theory about which columns were severed, how, and when that matches the visual evidence.

[LordDavidVader]

@kkkaldav Post the entire interview.

[kkkaldav]

Here's a thought (just a thought): take one box column; drill a hole in in it; pour a load of thermite/thermate through the hole and into the column; stand well back and set the fucker off (I don't know the technical term for this). Seems to me that the box column will do the job of holding the thermite/thermate in place as it works its melting magic. Or, perhaps you could place explosives inside the columns and the columns themselves would dampen the sound of their own destruction. Whae kens!

[kkkaldav]

@LordDavidVader Re the liar Roberts: Are you seriously suggesting that someone could wade into the ground zero rubble of 220 storeys and identify and collect the particular molten metal that fell from the particular window. And are you further suggesting that someone would have had reason to do this several years before that particular metal from that particular window became the focus of any attention at all.

[LordDavidVader]

@kkkaldav "The scientific flaw in NIST's report is that there was no science." well with a comment like that I can tell there is no point in discussing anything with you. (your pathetic video of Mark Roberts "lying" confirms this)

[kkkaldav]

@LordDavidVader The scientific flaw in NIST's report is that there was no science. They withheld their data (photos and videos). They conducted no forensic examination and instead produced some cartoons without releasing the details of how they were produced. They increased temperatures and fire lengths for their models arbitrarily. They invented fuel sources without any supporting evidence. And they ignored all evidence that was inconsistent with their fire-driven-collapse speculation.

[LordDavidVader]

Well I guess it's obvious we will never agree so I will leave you with the question you avoided answering (similar to all truthers) Where is the scientific flaw in NIST's report?