The Great Eyeglasses Scam Part 2

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,763
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 5, 2009

Learn how reading glasses help prevent nearsightedness.
Interview with Donald Rehm on nearsightedness prevention. Part 2 of 4
Official forum for the interview: http://www.breakfornews.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2254

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Maybe if you wore your glasses you're vision would be 20/800 right now.

  • yeah yea... dont belive him he's an optomitrst and he wants you to buy him a cottage

see all

All Comments (17)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Blacksquareable Thanks for your commentary. No they will not talk about plus-prevention for you. That is why Don's work is so valuable. The ODs are an arrogant disaster. If you want to read about this, go to sci. med. vision and make your own judgement about there non-existent "professional attitude. (There ARE ODs who support plus prevention for there own children. Never forget that.

  • @Blacksquareable It is indeed tragic. I think they have an OBLIGATION, when you are at 20/40, and -3/4 diopters, to VOLUNTEER information that the minus is an exacerbating agent. All they would have to do is to tell you this, that prevention is indeed "difficult" but wise. Then they would tell you to type, "MyopiaFree" on the internet, and read about prevention -- whether you "like it or not". But they "win" with their silence, and you loose. This is Don Rehm's complaint.

  • Ooh yes that happened to me. I was initially prescribed a minus lens for close work when I am in fact longsighted. I was in so much agony and opticians completely ignored my requests to try plus lenses (which they don't like to do cuz you can get these cheaply from a chemist)

  • We should all remember that science shows that "long-term" near produces a negative state for the natural eye. How do we know? When primates are in the wild -- their vision is excellent. Place these SAME primates in a cage for seven years, and they become very negative, from -1.6 to -5 diopters. There is no "cause of defect", but a very natural process. Kid with nose-on-book INDUCE that negative status.

  • I "gave up" on ODs. Now I just get my lenses from Zennioptical. I also confirm my visual acuity on my Snellen, and if I "need" glasses, I determine what I need and order them myself -- thus avoiding the OD completely. There seems to be no other way.

  • @OntologicalQuandary Plus lenses are reading glasses, get them from poundland lol

  • @cedarshrub You never wore them? You have no idea how magnificent your decision was. I made the mistake of wearing them because I was fooled into it by parents and it's the biggest regret that I have. I'm sure your eyesight would have gotten MUCH worse had you worn them. I'm about to go blind so I know.

  • @herbs814 I think the same goes with other commercial products like facial wash and shampoo.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more