Without US commitment Copenhagen breaks down Pt.2

The global south will pay the price of inaction

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• global
• warming
• debate
• cap
• and
• trade
• politics
• senate
• congreass
• Copenhagen
• realnews
• real
• news

[micahgee]

@kayak17

It is real, live with it.

There is a vested interested in denying that human activity can harm the planet, because polluting is profitable under the current system.

Global warming is real and the planet is not ending anytime soon but it does matter to everyone on earth.

Frankly, the complete denial of the facts IS redic!

[Dalambam]

"What scientific evidence points to global warming, much less that it is due to human contribution?" - The existence of global warming isn't debated, (it's just statistics). It's whether human activity is the main cause of it that's debated. On that there are roughly two opposing views: the view of ~990 out of every 1000 people with expertise relevant to climate science, that is that human actvity is the main cause of global warming;

[mindiga]

Nice. We have to argue with people who have no clue, but continue to destroy the planet. They like to ignore fact that future does not vote, so they steal the future for their punny joy at present. However, their kids will pay for their parent stupidity. Evolution does its job on their genes, even if they deny it. I do not have to argue, I just enjoy watching them going extinct.

Ave Universe!

[bbburton]

Hey Paul Jay, why don't you go back to Canada, if they'll have you.

[1timedrifter]

The Government has a plan. It's called DEPOPULATION!

[0PsycoDad0]

Dude, kudos for your efforts but as a matter of fact it´s useless to debate such idiots. These AJ loonys lie, cherry pick and twist around reality just as creationist morons do.

BTW have you heard about the gigant tar sand project in Alberta, Canada?

[0PsycoDad0]

"Climate Gate scandal"

ROFL!

It´s funny how retards continue to cite completly obsolete "sources".

Just like religious idiots continue their rants about missing transitional fossils.

[0PsycoDad0]

LOL!

It does and "the hockey stick" is a gross simplifiction by researchers to make the general trend more visible. But religious idiots like you twist everything in their favor.

[0PsycoDad0]

Well , as you´re too retarded to understand NOAA´s datasets or too paranoid to attribute them credibility, it ´s you who has faith.

You are a liar; quite common as religious freaks trying to look "reasonable".

[NicosNicosNicosNicos]

Furthermore,I was addressing readers of this page in general and made a point of not entering into a tit-for tat exchange with you! Anyone who wants to know, including you, can read about it for themselves and verify where the scientific consensus lies.

[NicosNicosNicosNicos]

None of the so-called"dissenting"(correct spelling)scientists have published any credible material in peer-reviewed scientific journals to anything vaguely ressembling the exceptionally stringent degree of peer scrutiny and thoroughness which is applied to the science on climate change,which is widely recognised -by scientists,not by charlatans and industry propagandists.Citing examples of bad practice that may reflect on the individuals concerned cannot alter the basic state of affairs.

[iwantgmail]

.... continued from previous

The trust was also lost when the IPCC, in its 2001 report, decided to adopt the Mann Hockey Stick curve as its standard reference model for the global temperature for the past 1000 years.

The hockey stick curve does not show the medieval warm period or the little ice age, both were well accepted historic climatic events in 2001.

Established science is never discarded with out scrutiny but that is what the IPCC did in 2001.

to be continued ....