Deadly Inoculations with Dr. Andrew Wakefield 1/2

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
135,944
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 22, 2011

The smoking-gun evidence
Professor Walker-Smith's 1996 presentation at the Royal Free Hospital Medical School was entitled, "Entero-colitis and Disintegrative Disorder Following MMR - A Review of the First Seven Cases."

His presentation notes began with the following text: ""I wish today, to present some preliminary details concerning seven children, all boys, who appear to have entero-colitis and disintegrative disorder, probably autism, following MMR. I shall now briefly present
their case history [sic]."

He then went on to detail the clinical history of these seven children as derived from his medical team as well as senior pathologist Dr Amar Dhillon. Importantly, Dr Andrew Wakefield was not part of this investigation. This means that Dr Wakefield's findings were independently replicated by another medical research team.

The British Medical Journal's accusations against Dr Wakefield -- that he fabricated his findings -- are therefore false. The mainstream media accusation that Dr Wakefield's findings have "never been replicated" is also blatantly false.

Here are the notes on the seven children, as presented in 1996, 14 months BEFORE Dr Wakefield published his landmark paper in The Lancet:

Child 1. Immediate reaction to MMR with fever at 1 [corrected, illegible]
Rapid deterioration in behaviour - autism
Histology active chronic inflammation in caecum
Treated Asacol
INDETERMINATE COLITIS** (1)

Child 2. MMR at 15 months - head banging 2 weeks later.
Hyperactive from 18 months.
Endoscopy - aphthoid ulcer at hepatic flexure
Caecum: lymphoid nodular hyperplasia with erythematous rim and pale swollen
core.
Histology, Ileum mild inflammation, colon moderate inflammation
Acute and chronic inflammation.
Treated CT3211 [a dietary treatment]
INDETERMINATE COLITIS** ? CROHN'S DISEASE

Child 3. ? dysmorphism - chromosomes and normal development
MMR at 5 months [sic]
Measles at 2.5 years* - 1 month later change in behavior
Hyperactive with food
Colonoscopy - granular rectum, normal colon and lymphoid nodular
hyperplasia.
Histopathology: lymphoid nodular hyperplasia.
Increased eosinophils 5/5 mild increase in inflammatory cells (Dhillon)
Routine normal
LYMPHOID NODULAR HYPERPLASIA
INDETERMINATE COLITIS**
[* correction: he received measles vaccine first at approximately 15 months of
age and MMR at 2.5. years]

Child 4 (2). Reacted to triple vaccine 4 months - screaming and near cot death
(DPT)
MMR at 15 months - behaviour changed after 1 week.
"measles rash" week before
Endoscopy - minor abnormalities of vascular pattern
Histology - non-specific proctocolitis**
Treated
INDETERMINTE PROCTOCOLITIS
LYMPHOID NODULAR HYPERPLASIA

Child 5 (3). MMR at 14 months.
Second day after, fever and rash, bangs head and behaviour abnormal
thereafter.
Endoscopy - Lymphoid nodular hyperplasia
Histopathology: Marked increase in IEL's [intraepithelial lymphocytes] in ileum
with chronic inflammatory cells in reactive follicles. Increase in inflammatory cells in colon and IELs increased.
LYMPHOID NODULAR HYPERPLASIA
INDETERMINATE COLITIS

Child 6 (7). MMR - 16 months - no obvious reaction
2 years behavioral change - 2.5 years
Screaming attacks - / food related
Endoscopy - Lymphoid nodular hyperplasia terminal ileum
Histology - Prominent lymphoid follicles
Dhillon: moderate to marked increase in IEL's, increase in chronic inflammatory
cells throughout the colon - superficial macrophages not quite granuloma
INDTERMINATE COLITIS
Child 78. MMR 14 months
16 months "growling voice"
18 months - behavioural changes - autism diagnosed at 3 years
Barium [follow through X ray] 5 cm tight stricture [proximal] to insertion of
terminal ileum
Endoscopy- prominent lymphoid follicle in ileum
Mild proctitis with granular mucosa
Histology
Ileum - reactive follicles
Colon - bifid forms, increased IEL's
Slight increase in inflammatory cells
INDETERMINATE COLITIS
? CROHN'S DISEASE

http://www.naturalnews.com/031116_Dr_Andrew_Wakefield_British_Medical_Journal...
NOTES:
(1) Inflammation that is not diagnostic of either Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis
(2) Child 6 in The Lancet paper. The chronological order was corrected for the final Lancet paper.
(3) Child 3 in The Lancet paper

http://www.infowars.com/
(Subscribe to Nightly News Today!)
http://www.prisonplanet.tv/news/

  • likes, 30 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • you should take care of your voice. Sounds like a drunken sailor ;-)

    But interesting video, thanks.

  • Dr. Wakefield, Thank you so much for your courage to tell the truth! Your studies have helped me and my family; we can't tell you how valuable your work has been in our lives. Understanding the link between the bowel and the brain is SO IMPORTANT. We are so grateful to you for teaching this to us and the world.

see all

All Comments (354)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @oJKBo PS- Here is another eye-opening study from the British Medical Journal: "Relation of study quality, concordance, take home message, funding, & impact in studies of influenza vaccines" (bmj. com/ content/ 338/ bmj. b354. abstract): "Search of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and the web... identified 259 primary studies. Higher quality studies were significantly more likely to show concordance between data presented and conclusions and less likely to favour effectiveness of vaccines"

  • @oJKBo - Once again, I remind you that several studies have found measles outbreaks in highly vaccinated populations. SEE: archinte . ama-assn . org / cgi / content / abstract / 154 / 16 / 1815

  • @oJKBo - Yes, they were still giving Measles-Mumps-Rubella as single shots, as well as the new JE vax, which contains MERCURY, one of the most neurotoxic substances known. And you call me retarded, LOL. Secondly, the Cochrane Collaboration published a REVIEW of many already existing studies, which found no evidence for OR AGAINST the vaccine-autism link, which has been disingenuously claimed to be conclusive proof that Wakefield was wrong.

  • @bitterbonker goodfucking bye /watch?v=RfdZTZQvuCo

  • @bitterbonker IT FUCKING PROVES THAT 10 OF THE 13 AUTHORS DID NOT ACTUALLY BELIEVE IN THEIR WORK, WHEN SCIENTISTS BELIEVE IN THEIR FINDINGS--NO MATTER HOW ABSURD THEYRE CLAIMED TO BE THEY STAND FIRM BECAUSE THEY FUCKING KNOW ITS RIGHT, 10 OF THOSE AUTHORS KNEW THE WHOLE THING WAS BULLSHIT, ONCE THEY GOT CALLED FOR IT THEY TRIED TO SAVE THEIR CAREERS BECAUSE OF IT

  • @bitterbonker Japan got rid of the triple jab, not the vaccine which is still given in a single shot. And certain MMR vaccines carry a form of meningitis. Full load of mercury????, good god i wont talk with a fucking retard. Next youll be telling me we should ban x rays at the dentist. ARE YOU FUCKING MENTALLY RETARDED?? FIRST THE MMR VACCINE CAUSES AUTISM NOW ALL FUCKING VACCINES??? IS YOUR IQ BELOW 50?? HOW FUCKING STUPID ARE YOU?? HONSTLY HOW FUCKING STUPID???????

  • @oJKBo - Because they were leaned on. WHY THE FUCK do you think they published it to begin with? All that proves is that there is a pervasive bias and intimidation of people who publish controversial results.

  • @bitterbonker Cochrane Library published 31 reports saying there was no link, the EU put out 120 reports saying no link, furthermore WHY THE FUCK do you think almost all of his co authors backed off after the publishing??

  • @oJKBo - In Japan, the MMR was withdrawn (because it was causing meningitis), but at the same time the Japanese Encephalitis vaccine was introduced, with its full load of mercury. That study is a perfect example. They only looked at MMR withdrawal and completely ignored other factors. Japanese kids got more vaccines, and autism rates went up. MMR isn't the only vaccine that causes autism, that was just what Wakefield et al studied (because it was well-known to cause harm already)

  • @bitterbonker that is an outright lie, not only do you not have any evidence for it, even if you did it would be a matter of confusing correlation with causation. Oxford Uni scientist have provided a nice graph on their medical page that shows a massive drop in vaccination rates in Japan and an increase in autism spectrum disorders. What? taking evidence from a doctor who is a FRAUD and has been BANNED from practice in his own country proves how totally biased you are

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more