@topperheartramada if palestine today revolted an took all the west bank and gaza, the world would be pissed. if they started going further and took cities in israel and expelled jews from their homes and replaced them with palestinians from chile because israel wouldnt accept a cease fire how would the world react? but you dont seem to care that israel took more than its fair share of the partition. fyi a high ranking israeli said that nasser didnt pose a threat to israel :P
@ghaswerot123 In 1947 the Jews said yes to a peaceful partition. In 1948 the Arabs attacked and lost. Then up to 1967 they threatened to attack to avenge the loss of 1948. Their armies were poised to attack and Israel was in a life or death situation. Israel aunched a pre-emptive strike against an army that was obviously preparing to attack them. Just like they attacked again in 1973. Israel had nothing to win by war and was always only defending itself. You talk complete nonsense.
@topperheartramada in 67 the israelis attacked first, the troops nasser sent to the canal werent enough to liberate palestine. even israeli leaders acknowledged this fact. neither syria or jordan were ready for war. gurion said himself that partition was only the beginning. besides, if some1 stole my home i wouldnt just let him get away with it, i would want it back. there is no reason why the arabs should behave any differently
@ghaswerot123 oh, really? so all the arab states were not 8in any way trying to 'liberate' their precious 'province' in 1967? it was israel who attacked? wow! why the fuck woud israel attack? israel only wanted poeeace. israel was happy with the 1947 partition, it i didn't want more. it was the arabs who tried to annihilate them because they wanted all of it. same thing in 1967. the arabs wanted to destroy them and they launched a pre-emptive strike. you people are such hypocrites.
@topperheartramada like the french resistance, they used sabotage against israel, that means attacking shit and army. after 48 there was a conference in jericho that said that what is left of palestine will become part of a greater arab nation. palestine is an arab province just like iraq and morocco. 67 was started by israel and 73 was them trying to liberate sinai and golan, not palestine. arabs should try to destroy it, if someone took my home i wouldnt just accept that!
@ghaswerot123 why were they burning worthless infratsructure? why were not burning egyptian or jordanian worthless infrastructure? after all, between 1948 and 1967 they were occupied by these countries. was the 1967 war a minor incident? how about 1973? they were trying to burn all of israel then. you see, since the creation of israel the arabs have done nothing but try and destroy it. and yet they want to play the victim. it is incredible.
@topperheartramada the context was between 48 and 67 and yes that was the main tactic, burn worthless infrastructure and sabotage army positions. these were the same tactics that the french resistance used by the way. and the real terrorism by hamas started in 94 when suicide bombs were used. but these bombings were ALWAYS in response to something israel did. so israel is terrorizing herself by provoking hamas.
@ghaswerot123 do you seriously think that i would be interested in continuing a conversation with a person who claims not to be aware of any other terrorist activity by palestinians other than 'burning down trees'? seriously?
@topperheartramada genocidal attacks? you mean fatah running across the border and burning down israeli trees compared to israel slaughtering 60 villagers in a cross border raid that was in revenge for fatah shooting an israeli soldier? and yes they had EVERY fucking right to shoot that soldier!
get dunked arabs
sh1tpickle 1 week ago
@topperheartramada if palestine today revolted an took all the west bank and gaza, the world would be pissed. if they started going further and took cities in israel and expelled jews from their homes and replaced them with palestinians from chile because israel wouldnt accept a cease fire how would the world react? but you dont seem to care that israel took more than its fair share of the partition. fyi a high ranking israeli said that nasser didnt pose a threat to israel :P
ghaswerot123 1 month ago
@ghaswerot123 In 1947 the Jews said yes to a peaceful partition. In 1948 the Arabs attacked and lost. Then up to 1967 they threatened to attack to avenge the loss of 1948. Their armies were poised to attack and Israel was in a life or death situation. Israel aunched a pre-emptive strike against an army that was obviously preparing to attack them. Just like they attacked again in 1973. Israel had nothing to win by war and was always only defending itself. You talk complete nonsense.
topperheartramada 1 month ago
@topperheartramada in 67 the israelis attacked first, the troops nasser sent to the canal werent enough to liberate palestine. even israeli leaders acknowledged this fact. neither syria or jordan were ready for war. gurion said himself that partition was only the beginning. besides, if some1 stole my home i wouldnt just let him get away with it, i would want it back. there is no reason why the arabs should behave any differently
ghaswerot123 1 month ago
@ghaswerot123 oh, really? so all the arab states were not 8in any way trying to 'liberate' their precious 'province' in 1967? it was israel who attacked? wow! why the fuck woud israel attack? israel only wanted poeeace. israel was happy with the 1947 partition, it i didn't want more. it was the arabs who tried to annihilate them because they wanted all of it. same thing in 1967. the arabs wanted to destroy them and they launched a pre-emptive strike. you people are such hypocrites.
topperheartramada 1 month ago
@topperheartramada like the french resistance, they used sabotage against israel, that means attacking shit and army. after 48 there was a conference in jericho that said that what is left of palestine will become part of a greater arab nation. palestine is an arab province just like iraq and morocco. 67 was started by israel and 73 was them trying to liberate sinai and golan, not palestine. arabs should try to destroy it, if someone took my home i wouldnt just accept that!
ghaswerot123 1 month ago
@ghaswerot123 why were they burning worthless infratsructure? why were not burning egyptian or jordanian worthless infrastructure? after all, between 1948 and 1967 they were occupied by these countries. was the 1967 war a minor incident? how about 1973? they were trying to burn all of israel then. you see, since the creation of israel the arabs have done nothing but try and destroy it. and yet they want to play the victim. it is incredible.
topperheartramada 1 month ago
@topperheartramada the context was between 48 and 67 and yes that was the main tactic, burn worthless infrastructure and sabotage army positions. these were the same tactics that the french resistance used by the way. and the real terrorism by hamas started in 94 when suicide bombs were used. but these bombings were ALWAYS in response to something israel did. so israel is terrorizing herself by provoking hamas.
ghaswerot123 1 month ago
@ghaswerot123 do you seriously think that i would be interested in continuing a conversation with a person who claims not to be aware of any other terrorist activity by palestinians other than 'burning down trees'? seriously?
topperheartramada 1 month ago
@topperheartramada genocidal attacks? you mean fatah running across the border and burning down israeli trees compared to israel slaughtering 60 villagers in a cross border raid that was in revenge for fatah shooting an israeli soldier? and yes they had EVERY fucking right to shoot that soldier!
ghaswerot123 1 month ago