Lindsey Graham and NDAA

Military given go-ahead to detain US terrorist suspects without trial. Republican senator (and Israeli agent), Lindsey Graham, cheers trashing of the Bill of rights.

Per Senator Graham concerning American citizens - "And when they say, 'I want my lawyer,' you tell them, 'Shut up. You don't get a lawyer.'"

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/dec/15/americans-face-guantanamo-detenti...

Senator Graham on his knees before a foreign nation:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VlVCH1j7Enc&feature=related

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Lindsey
• Graham
• NDAA
• Treason

[oracleofdelphire]

NDAA 2012 merely codifies federal judicial law. That means detention of citizen enemy combatants is already held a constitutional exercise of executive authority of War Powers. So getting pissed over the legislation is pretty retarded. Judicial law is law, just as much as a bill in congress. The only way to change the policy is to wait for the composition of the supreme court to change, not by waiving pitchforks at congress...

[ramzpaul]

@oracleofdelphire Maybe when these traitors are on trial for treason they can use that as a defense? Oh, wait a minute, they will no longer get a trial based on NDAA. Sucks for them. Maybe they should have thought of that before the gleefully trashed the Bill of Rights.

I know that the honorable Senator Graham thinks this will be used only for those evil Muslims. He might be in for a rude surprise if one day a new government classifies him as an "enemy combatant".

[oracleofdelphire]

@ramzpaul You're right, a criminal trial has nothing to do with the NDAA. But as I stated, the NDAA is redundant legislation. The 6th amnd requires a trial in "criminal prosecutions" not for war-time detainment. It sounds like you take issue with Art II of the Con which authorizes the president to wage war which the SC has always held the pres can do whatever the hell he wants. However, detainees can petition unlawful detainment anything else would exceed the scope of the judiciary.

[ramzpaul]

@oracleofdelphire Of course, "war" was defined by an act of Congress against another nation. Now we have the vague "war" on terror which will never end.

[WizardKing78]

If the Jews didn't control the media, the political and demographic landscape in America would be completely different. No NDAA, no illegal Mexicans...

[httm241]

@ramzpaul did you know he is in the same senate seat as old racist strom thurmond

[randomjelly255]

@Wylff Well sure, there's been some talk about Israel, because its such a controversial topic, but not as much as the anti-zionist maniacs would want you to believe. Every anti-free speech law from Jews? Really now, do you know the exact names of the people that proposed NDAA, SOPA and PIPA? Do you know for sure that they are Jewish? "Hate crimes" aren't crimes unless someone actually gets hurt. Thinking something shouldn't qualify as a hate crime. Truth > Lies > Your version of the "truth".

[Wylff]

@randomjelly255 "anti-free speech law is because of Israel and Jews."

You are just ignorant, if you actually research the subject, you would find that almost every anti-free speech law is from jews as are all the pro-mass-immigration. And jews are the ones who benefit from it. In fact US is one of the few western countries, where you will not get fined or imprisoned for even pointing out jewish influence in for example media.

[Wylff]

@randomjelly255 In Sweden for example anti-semtism is defined as "Believing jews have influence in media", and anti-semtism is ofc a "hatecrime" and for "hatecrimes" you are fined or sent to prison. Well, the largest media owner in Sweden is Bonnier, and they are jewish family. So if you speak the truth in Sweden, you are fined or imprisoned for it. Bad for Swedes, bad for the truth, good for jews.

[Wylff]

@randomjelly255 "And I hardly hear any talk about Israel in the presidential debates"

Hahahahaha, well, let fill you in : "We must bomb Iran to protect Israel, Israel is facing an existential threat, we stand by Israel, we must start world war 3 for Israel, Israel is a key ally, USA will always protect its key ally Israel, Israel got our 100% support, Israel, Israel, Israel, " then every candidates goes to AIPAC and swears his alligance to the jewish state.

[randomjelly255]

@Wylff NDAA has nothing to do with opposing Israel, only suspected terrorists, they're not gonna put people in prison just for protesting against Israel. And I hardly hear any talk about Israel in the presidential debates, I do watch every single GOP debate although they're usually very hard to sit through, with their nonsense. I oppose NDAA because it invades our constitutional rights for a free trial, but it seems like many people think every anti-free speech law is because of Israel and Jews.

[Wylff]

@randomjelly255 Indeed, jews don't benefit at all when the government start putting people in camps for opposing Israel which ofc = terrorist. I mean, jews are the most influential ethnic group in USA, most of the campaign contributions for all candidates comes from jews, and US president candidates just stumble over each other on who can lick Israels feet the most. Why on earth would the supremacists elite have any use for a bill that makes anyone they do not like disappear?

[woodenmajor]

RP, the original language omitted US citizens from NDAA ,guess who lobbied to get it to INCLUDE americans inside the USA ...everyone pls see sen levin's clip on NDAA .and HOW it got REWRITTEN ...here's a hint ,it WASN"T lindsey Graham .

[delano31326]

When Lindsey Graham ask for a lawyer you tell him NO! Only real americans get a lawyer, your a trailor you don't get a lawyer.