Yahushua vs. Paul... Did they teach the same things?

Comparing the Doctrine of Paul to the teachings of Yahushua

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Paul
• Yahushua
• Jesus
• God
• Yah
• Hebrew
• Israelite
• Doctrine

[kbdory]

when you really look at it, they are teaching the same thing. You are simply over looking the facts. These verses are not wrong, they are not being studied at all(it seems), because if you study them, then they are teaching the same thing, just in a different view.  Go back, read for yourself, do your homework(truly study), and you will see. Peace...

[YoelBenYsryael]

@kbdory First, nobody said the verses were "wrong". secondly reading for ones self and (truly studying) will show that barring some lack of common sense... the teaching are completely different. To say that they are denotes an utter lack of critical thinking skills (it seems)... and that is detrimental to acknowledging things that are simply true... like the complete polar opposites of their teachings.

Peace...

[NewWorldDestroyer]

You neglected to mention that Peter, James, and the rest of the elders were in ERROR  when they wrote that letter.......they changed the Law.

Leviticus 24: 22

"Ye shall have one manner of law, as well for the stranger, as for one of your own country: for I am the LORD your God."

My question is. if Peter was to be the apostle to the Gentiles, inspired by Christ, how could they so drastically have errored and so soon after Christ supposedly died......with no correction ever from Christ?

[YoelBenYsryael]

I didn't neglect to mention anything. This video was not about Peter or James... it was about Paul's doctrine in comparison to Yahushua's.

Furthermore Acts 15:21 indicates that James made the point that the entire Law of Moses was taught in every city every sabbath day. The letter was not to trouble the newly converted Gentiles but to reiterate some basics that particularly pertained to them. In that light I disagree that Peter, James, and the brethren were in error.

[NewWorldDestroyer]

@YoelBenYsryael

Acts 15; 28

28For it seemed good to the Holy Ghost, and to us, to lay upon you NO GREATER BURDEN THAN THESE necessary things;

29 ...........from which if ye keep yourselves, ye shall do well. Fare ye well.

Understand what your reading my brotha. No, if you keep only those 4 laws, your not going to do well, very well.......not true. Just consider what Im saying......cuz it is soooo obvious that they changed the law.

[YoelBenYsryael]

Again... my video was about PAUL and I only pointed out what is written in their teachings. Its kind of funny that you admonish me to "understand what I read" but in typical christian apologetic fashion you fail to realize why that scripture in Leviticus (Law given to a sovereign people under no foreign ruler) does not apply to Roman ruled Jerusalem.

In any case it isn't my intention to argue with you.

[YoelBenYsryael]

The letter was to Gentiles in Antioch and dealt with specific issues pertaining specifically to THEM. Idol worship and the like. Again in context James did not negate the Law as he made clear in verse 21.

[ave383]

great video

[4Romans8]

@NewWorldDestroyer ~ In Acts 15:24 there is no "Ye must be circumcised, and keep the law" in the original text.

It says literally, "Since, in fact, we hear that some coming out out from us disturb you with words, upsetting your spirits, whom we gave no assignment.

[klubpro]

Saul of Tarsus is a snake, the father of today's "religion" Luke, Mark, and even Peter, the denier, are snakes as well.

[scripturetruthseeker]

Good video thanks for posting it

[yshuaknesset]

@NewWorldDestroyer You should take your own advice, Peter and James didn't say "honor thy father & mother, it would be foolish to assume they were only talking of those 4 commandments.

They did not impose the whole law at one time, the nations are to come to the synagogue and learn what Moses taught and be obedient, after being persuaded in there own mind, not doing the law by the letter but in the spirit. When you 1st received the law were you ready to do the whole Law ?