Future Shock (1972) 4/5
Top Comments
All Comments (118)
-
"the consequences of what we do today...determines what tomorrow will bring"
-
9:40 oh, so THATS why technology is being suppressed, its to reduce future shock...
i thought it was just because corporations wanted money or some shit but i respect them now
-
I don't think technology's the threat.It's how people misuse it,as they inevitably do-from Hiroshima/Nagasaki on down to texting while driving.
-
I hope there will be lots of young Elizabeth Taylor's to go around.
-
@james1200 heard that he was going to do the voice of Darth Vader b4 James Earl Jones got it
-
Of course you would. Because that's the narrative you're fed, and which you accept without question.
-
@8:45 explains our massive failure circa 2011
-
Despite all the doomsaying, this documentary was pretty optimistic about technology. Especially in the realms of AI and genetics--which we soon found were far more complicated puzzles to solve than we first thought.
-
Hmm, the technology could destroy us...
Read Disconnect by Devra Davis, maybe cellular technology isn't as safe as they say it is!
-
@james1200 Regarding socialism, before it was called socialism, it had other names. It's not a new system, and Marx didn't come up with it. For example, the American colonies in the early 17th century were operated under a system virtually identical to communism. . . they just called it Feudalism. Same system, different name.
Perhaps Mr. Wells was the greatest doomsayer of all time!!!
krazygrrrl 2 years ago 13
Oh my god. So it was Orson Welles, and NOT George W. Bush that started the whole "nucular" pronunciation of nuclear!!!
Listen carefully at 6:32 and at 6:37. He totally says "nucular".
JoshSitar 1 year ago 6