Re: NIST Report on WTC7 debunked and exposed!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFpbZ-aLDLY&feature=email

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Building
• 9/11
• 11
• 9-11
• truth
• NIST
• National
• Institute
• Standards
• Technology
• Report
• NCSTAR
• Shyam
• Sunder
• John
• Gross
• evidence
• thermite
• demolition

[vengencefrom1979]

just making my rounds, hows that marilyn monroe vid doing?

[Tinfoilhatlady]

@vengencefrom1979

wait a month and you'll see...art takes time my friend :)

[QUOZO777]

keep speaking the truth

[Tinfoilhatlady]

@QUOZO777

sure will

[Jcm9991]

I totally agree with you. Good video response. Thumbs up :)

[Tinfoilhatlady]

@Jcm9991

cheers!

[tenagliac]

Luckily the vid of which you speak appears in the related videos. Wtached it. Darn good research. Now needs legal followthru. WTC7 fell maybe because it was a target but the plane never made it. So either f93 was the intended or some other building is compromised and ready to drop on the wrong signal. What hit DC was also in doubt. Again research & followthru. If not a plane. What ? Then where is THAT plane ? Hmmmm.

[RexNunc]

MSM only calls people idiots when they question 9/11, or they do what Michael Cherkoff did when asked about nano-thermate. Switch topics in a blatant way, or completely ignore it.

[iBlindGame]

Sunder on What Controlled Demolition Looks Like

watch?v=4ZrcDTjkIhI

[grandmastershek]

@swu880

Oh don't tell them that! They throw around the words "science" and "physics". They obviously know wtf they are talking about if they can invoke the words right?

[grandmastershek]

"Science" means employing the scientific method and submitting your work to your peers in real forums for scrutiny. It is not starting with a conclusion and only accepting evidence with corroborates your conclusion, or distorting facts. It is also not avoiding legitimate scrutiny by faking peer review in a self made journal, one which implements no peer review, or posting on your findings youtube.

Just as bad as creationists.

[grandmastershek]

LOL! @ "perfect". How many pages does the WTC 7 report have? man hours? pages?, etc? According to this "perfect" video is was 10K pages, 200K man-hours, & 7 yrs. The only problem is that's the stats for entire NIST report for the WTC. Yeah its so perfect the guy couldn't even bother to go to the actual report & look at the last page to see its 88 pages. Its about as "perfect as the way the 3 building fell "perfectly" into their own footprints (they didn't). Bang up job guys as usual.

[swu880]

@shanquilla562

this coming from the same moron who thinks freefall is a speed- hahhaha