My trip to Ground Zero (8)

Chattin with truthers

Category:

Comedy

Tags:

• NYC
• 9-11
• truthers

[LoganMarvel]

Scientific/psychiactric research has proven that eyewitness accounts are often mis-leading when people are asked about certain details of an event such as color and numbers. When in the heat of the moment, people miss factual descriptions even more since they're all nervous and obviously have more important things to think about like how to get out alive. Never mind the fact that people naturally think differently and see things differently too.

[CHF2]

Dozens of people can't all be mistaken about seeing a plane crash.

[warlord2080]

0:09 0:11 "some people may be connected to the news media or connected to the government" no proof of that claim nor any person that may be connected to the government. it seems to me that your just blowing off this question.

LoganMarvel

They are not in a wheel of danger as of people who escaped from world trade center so basically your justification for the scientific and psychiactric research wouldn't be included into flight 77 crash.

[tarkus21]

IT IS EASY TO DEBATE ONE ISSUE  AT A TIME...WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE ENTIRE EVENT ... IT STINKS OF COVER UP !

[GooseGrl172]

"And Hani Hanjour. Amazing pilot on 9/11. Shit pilot every other day of his life. "

Nah, he was a shitty pilot that day too; for the love of God, he CRASHED a plane!

[CarnivoreEschelon]

WRONG it follows the flightpath given the physica;l location and the fact flt 77 came from the south towerd the south facing wall of the pentagon

[CarnivoreEschelon]

sorry but concurrent facts backed with physical evidence is what occured.

[leftysergeant]

The physical evidence is more consistant with the majority report of an aircraft. Therefore, the majority report, of a twin-engine airliner is supportable by the physical evidence. The minority is not.

[leftysergeant]

esope, anyone with an IQ over 80 knows that things look bigger, taller, or smaller, shorter , lighter or darker, depending on the distance from which they are viewed. Anyone who knows bugger-all about what high explosive munitions or aircraft do to a wall knows that airplanes are more likely than explosivew muniitions to print wing marks on a concrete wall. The observations are testable in this manner. The majority observation of an aircraft proves out. bservation of a missile doesn't.

[cschin11]

u don't mistake a missile for a plane

[CHF2]

The flight path given by the two cops: contradicted by everyone else. BTW, they also claim the jet hit the Pentagon.

FDR flight path: analyzed by the morons at "pilots for truth."

Hani: his flight instructor says he thinks Hani flew the plane into the Pentagon, but truthers like to stop his interview before he says so.

[esopxe]

It sounds like you're assuming that the choices we have are flight 11 or a missile. I personally don't know what hit the Pentagon but I see too many problems with the official story. Two Pentagon cops have contradicting stories to the official flight path. Where's all the damn video? The FDR doesn't match the official flight path. And Hani Hanjour. Amazing pilot on 9/11. Shit pilot every other day of his life.