Veteran Living in Anti-Gun Chicago Kills Intruder

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
17,309
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 4, 2010

An elderly veteran bought a shotgun after being robbed by three armed criminals earlier in the year. Living in anti-gun Chicago, he was forced to use that shotgun to save his life. This shooting, plus another recent defensive shooting in Chicago, has citizens angry that self-defense is illegal in Chicago.

These videos, plus stories from TheArmedCitizen.com, prove Chicago's mayor Daley's ignorance; criminalizing self-defense will never stop hoodlums, and will only hurt law-abiding citizens.

Video from:
http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=news/local&id=7462699

Abusive, profane or racist posts will not be approved.

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (TheArmedCitizen)

  • Burglary, not robbery. Robbery is the same as mugging. Burglary is entering and stealing from a building.

  • @Riflemanm16a2 Robbery if people are present and you are taking from them. Burglary if no one is present to be stolen from.

Top Comments

  • i'm confused. The description says the old man used a shotgun.  But the ditzy newscaster asks at the end "will he be given a citation for violating the HANDGUN ban". Maybe the liberal gun banners dont know the difference between a shotgun and a handgun???

see all

All Comments (51)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • But they took his gun, leaving him defenseless in the face of the punks hommies.

    Bet the mayor and the cops are laughing about that.

  • The homeowner is 80 years old, need I say more.

  • their law is crazy. their mayor is crazy. they want their citizen become a sitting duck.

  • ... And the man still performs his civil duties... Out-f---ing standing!

  • that old man didn't protect himself or his family he just wanted to kill again since he probably last killed someone during the korean war thats what i think.

  • @AntaresInScorpius I noticed the same thing. If he had a shotgun, THAT'S the only reason they didn't charge him. My understanding is that the ban is specifically on handguns.

  • I feel sorry for Chicago residents because like they said the criminals have guns they dont care about them being illegal because well they are criminals and it puts the citizens at risk for not being able to rightfully defend their lifes

  • Another great "Armed Citizen" story. It's extremely important to keep in mind that it's the elderly and infirm who MOST need to have some good means (like firearms) to protect themselves. Guns are a great promoter of human rights because they MOST help those who need the MOST help!

  • Daley doesn't have the guts to file charges against the War Veteran because Daley knows the NRA will do what Obama can't do: Kick His A........

  • "Its gonna be them or us when you come into our house." Amen to Castle law!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more