Re: Anti-Homosexual Movement Challenge

My response to the anti-homosexuality of this person. And his quote, and explaining why I can't see this as right.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Homosexuality
• Evil
• Satan
• Movement
• 666
• Hypocrite
• Minister
• Abdallah
• child
• molestor
• pedophile
• gay
• agenda
• Sodom
• Gomorrah

[jambalaya54321]

A Catholic priest is much more likely to molest a kid than a gay person is.

Gay means you're attracted to people of your own gender, not that you like to touch children. Not all straight molest little girls, and not all gay men molest little boys. Not all straight women molest little boys, and not all gay women molest little girls. Whether your a pedophile or not has nothing to do with whether you're gay, straight, bisexual, or transgender.

[jambalaya54321]

Also, you say that you're a Christian. The Sixth of the Ten Commandments is "Do Not Murder" which, might I add, both Christians and Muslims both follow. So obviously neither you nor your Muslim friends are very dedicated to their religion.

[MMarvel22]

Your accent is so funny lol haha u speak fairly slow ahaha

[Prim3StaR]

To be fair, I am a Christian and yet bisexual. TBH, gender makes about as much difference to me as hair color. Sure, I'd have a boyfriend if I could get one, but kissing and dating is as far as it'd go - I would do nothing with another gut that I wouldn't do otherwise if I'm not yet married to them. Because really, what's the difference? I hate to have to feel bad about it, but I will be loyal to both my religion AND my attractions. I'm attracted to people, not genders. Naysayers can **** off.

[idontsignin]

Homosexuality is perfectly natural to me, I find the female form unattractive and the male form attractive, and I don't mean to be disgusting but a vagina actually turns my stomach and I have absolutely nothing against women before I get the comments

[Soushokukeidanshi]

@ddemonicflame It's not difficult. Look at any medical dictionary besides the one you found online.

[ddemonicflame]

@Soushokukeidanshi Don't leave me hanging, give a definition from a correct one please? :)

[Soushokukeidanshi]

@ddemonicflame Your online medical dictionary is wrong.

[ddemonicflame]

@Soushokukeidanshi Just looked on an online medical dictionary, and it defines 'natural' as "occurs in nature, without the intervention of humans". So surely 'someone is born that way' = 'natural'. I'm not knowledgeable on medical terms, so I could easily be wrong. At the end of the day, it's not worth arguing about; we are both now clear on my meaning, so whether you can call medical conditions natural or not makes no difference.

[Soushokukeidanshi]

@ddemonicflame This doesn't mean that the person is 'bad' or inherently 'evil' but rather there is a condition which the majority of the population don't tend to share as a general rule. In short, there isn't anything wrong with being born gay or infertile. It just happens.

[Soushokukeidanshi]

@ddemonicflame Once again, a couple that is infertile isn't 'natural'. There is a medical reason for it. Nature makes mistakes, everyone knows that. However, when you use the argument that someone being born 'infertile' because 'nature made them that way' is not the same as 'natural'. Some one could argue that 'homosexuality' is because 'someone is born that way' but it doesn't mean that it's 'natural'.

[ddemonicflame]

@Soushokukeidanshi I was meaning it in the way of people saying "homosexuality is unnatural" because they don't think that homosexuals can be born homosexuals. I was using 'natural' to mean born that way - as I said, maybe it wasn't technically the right word to use.

It was only in the context of a person saying "natural = good, so hetero sex = good", and pointing out that nature isn't perfect, what about heterosexual infertile couples? Nature made them that way.