Has history been tampered with? Homer's "Iliad" tells the tale of the First Crusade

Has history been tampered with? When we think of Homer's Troy, we imagine it in fantasy hues of times long gone. And yet the latest research conducted of one of the world's leading mathematicians proves it to us irrefutably: what we know as the "Trojan War" was in fact the First Crusade!
CLICK ON AMAZON.COM LINK!
We aren't talking about obvious parallels between two major military campaigns separated by millennia - the Trojan War and the First Crusade are but different names of one and the same military campaign. The former ended up in the distant past due to the blatantly erroneous chronology that we use - one that was created by the Jesuits in the 16th 17th century. This chronology, regarded by many as the absolute historical truth, contains many gaps and repetitions. Most major historical events (as well as personalities and even places) have several phantom duplicates arbitrarily dated to various antediluvian epochs and presumed completely unrelated to one another - the Trojan War and the First Crusade are a perfect example. Our entire view of the so-called "Antiquity" and the Middle Ages changes radically; history becomes streamlined and unencumbered by all the dark ages, lost empires and mystical cyclic patterns that afflict the official version. The duplicates all roll into a single historical reality - Classical Greek poleis become one with the mediaeval Crusader states, ancient Egyptian paganism identifies as Coptic Christianity, and historical Troy, Constantinople and Jerusalem turn out to be the same city on the Bosporus, which we know as Istanbul. The city in Palestine known as Jerusalem today remained a nondescript Arabic settlement called El-Kuds until the 18th century. There isn't a single Crusader map in existence that would locate Jerusalem in Palestine (or indeed give us any detailed information about that region) - unlike modern historians, mediaeval cartographers knew the location of the Holy Land perfectly well.

Sounds absurd? Not if you have read "History: Fiction or Science?" by Professor Anatoly Fomenko - a brilliant mathematician and a true scientist to the core - unconfined by dogmatic thinking and determined to get to the bare historical truth at any cost.

Dan Brown beats Martin Luther with "Da Vinci code"

Popular fiction dealing with conspiracies of one sort or another is actually quite tame as compared to reality. Dan Brown pens a possible conspiracy of the church against the memory of its originator Jesus. He follows unknowingly in the steps of Martin Luther who started his protestant revolution with accusation of Papal conspiracy in the matter of Constantine's testament, take good note that Martin Luther was right and the testament was false . Well he had as media outlet nothing better than the doors of the Wittenberg's cathedral. Dan Brown has mass media at his disposal. The Roman Catholic Church, for instance, is involved in a much greater hoax than the most daring writer could possibly conceive of - one that deals with the very foundations of history itself. The above statement is neither an exaggeration, nor a metaphor - very few people are aware that the B C A D chronology as we know it was created by a handful of Jesuits in the 16th 17th century - Joseph Scaliger, Dionysius Petavius and their successors. We have grown so accustomed to a timeline that runs through many millennia, from the Egyptian pyramids to the present day, that the mere thought of questioning its veracity seems perfectly preposterous - just like the notion of a rotating earth must have seemed in the epoch of Galileo Galilei, and just as heretical. But nevertheless - the entire conception of ancient and mediaeval history know to us today owes its existence to a XVI century Jesuit hoax. A hoax that has finally been exposed with the aid of astronomy, mathematical statistics and modern computational facilities by one of the world's leading mathematicians - the Russian Academician A. T. Fomenko. His fundamental work on chronology, now available in English, is more fascinating than Dan Brown at his wildest. Yet it is truly a non-fiction work - that goes to say, everything else you have read about history should probably classify as fiction. And, let's face it, much duller fiction than "The Da Vinci Code" barnburner.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• dan
• brown
• greek
• history
• channel
• today
• roman
• science
• tartars
• ancient
• historical
• research
• da
• vinci
• logic
• biblical
• evolution
• german
• etruscan
• russian
• astronomy
• mongols
• baron
• crusade
• empire
• gothic
• culture
• gun
• sword
• map
• star
• victory
• virgin
• oil
• bread
• grain
• agriculture
• cows
• heathen
• vagrant
• barbarian
• torture
• habit
• cloth
• cloak
• dagger

[epidot010]

Ok. Several things. First, in the calibration of carbon dating you refer to the Libby half life, which was calculated by using pre-existing dates for ancient Egyptian artifacts. The current methods for calibrating radiocarbon measurements use the Cambridge half-life, which was calculated using dendrochronology, not human artifacts.

[mithec]

libby c14 5568+-30,cambridge 5730+-,method is good, dendrochronology calibration is statistical aberration. google>books>fomenko>pp80-90, rgds

[epidot010]

I have just one critique for this 'theory'. There have been literally tens of thousands of archaeological artifacts accurately dated by carbon-14 dating. This method is accurate to within several decades and can be used to date objects up to 40,000 years old. Are you suggesting that all those tens of thousands of independent measurements are wrong? And note; carbon dating is an exact science, unlike historical interpretation.

[mithec]

Radio-carbon method: This much touted method produces reliable dating of objects of organic origin with exactitude of plus minus 1500 years, therefore it is too crude for dating of historical events in the 3000 years timeframe! Initial calibration of this method was made basis artefacts of ancient Egypt already dated by historians. c14 dating runs as follows: archaeologist sends an artefact to a radiocarbon dating laboratory to rubberstamp his own idea of the age of the object.

[SteelWool91]

*NO OFFENCE* but this is just my opinion

BULLSHIT....

[RobinMosley24]

and dan brown is a proven left wing lying heretic and fool you blatantly distorts and flat out lies about "documents"...hes been soundly refuted, plus 50% of his crap is plain made up...

[RobinMosley24]

@ukmarco more anti-jesuit nonsense, homer's illiad was known world over by arabs persians and romans WELL BEFORE the "jesuits"....the trojan war refers to greece vs troy over helen which uccured troy was discovered as well as ancient discoveries have confirmed the homer story pottery-scenes etc

[RobinMosley24]

wrong first crusade was a lot different, your distorting things to make something appear as it wasnt, homer's illiad was a poem not pure history and there are dated copies before the crusade and mention of it way before as well

[mstew1021]

Yes, history has been tampered with all right. This video is a perfect example. Anyone who knows anything at all about the topics mentioned here understand what a crock this is.

[EsaulRuss]

@karakalos10 Do you know that Greeks are actually one of the tribes of early Slavs(Russians) ? If you do nmot know that then I advise you to reconsider all of the Greek history.

[EsaulRuss]

@adamamida NO ! Fomenko and his Academic collaborators have been working on a restoration of history for more than 20 years now.

[EsaulRuss]

This video is brief summary of the work of Anatoliy Fomenko which, I must say, is pretty interesting and very well grounded. You just need to watch or read all his works.

[nofxmike06]

history is written by the victors. Remember that.

[rugbyboy198127]

@mjwenzel i know history is a web of lies spun in order to gain and secure power, i have found through personal interest of ancient british history that what we are taught in schools and the accepted version of history has most definately been corrupted, they're only finally just confirming the 562 ad comet on britain, when if they'd bothered to check welsh(ancinet british)historical text lol nevermind but why nobody else saying this, why nobody backing him up? science/history is open in uk so?!

[ukmarco]

The worst form of religious fascism.