Jens Pulver vs Dai Chang Liang
Top Comments
All Comments (226)
-
Sanda fighters are not particularly good strikers compared to boxers and Muay Thai fighters. They usually try to take boxers or Muay Thai guys down with takedowns. The problem here is Jens Pulver is skilled in wrestling from his MMA experience and couldn't be taken down. So Sanda is forced to use their inferior striking. Result: Sanda got KTFO!
-
too weak.....
-
555
-
f uck off sanda.
-
I think the sanda fighter has better technique in many things the difference is that he wasted his energy throwing many kicks and he didnt fight with intelligence, on the other hand Jens knew how to use all his skills in the right way, he was smarter than the sand fighter
-
This is shootboxing in Japan. In shootboxing you can also do takedowns and standing submissions. A cool sport which is getting better. Look it up!
-
You don't need to kick when you have a left that's capable of collapsing stars.
-
@2fnez Ahhh.... The ol' liver block. Doesn't always work, does it?
-
usa fighters seems a more skilled boxer...but he cant kick.
-
I am a Chinese, and i think in Sanda field, American fighters tends to firstly defend and then attack compared with chinese ones, a very smart strategy.
It seems that in this match, Jens has more strength than our warrior
it seems the asian guys strategy of blocking jens left hooks with his liver failed
2fnez 8 months ago 10
你们好 Dai Chang Liang is very good in the kicks, the "chinese Sanda fights" trains well the techniques of feet and struggle/shuijiao/roudao but unfortunately it has some problems with the fists/boxing...improved the fists/box they would be excellent fighters.
the "Chinese Sanda" trains well the back and the tendons of the legs.
yiquanbytc 2 years ago 4