Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Just Say No to Dr. No's bad idea.....

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
2,132
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 3, 2008

Sponsor: http://NotFatAnymore.com - Me got to oppose Dr. Paul on one thing he suggested in his February netcast...even if it's only the second bad idea he's ever had...

If you want to commission an ad like the one in this video, PM me here at the Youtube channel or e-mail me: RidleyReport at live period com

Additional Keywords: liberty freedom free state project new hampshire ron paul dave ridley report libertarian democrat republican politics nutritional cleansing toxic operation live free or die revolution rebel alliance ronald reagan president primary

  • likes, 105 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (RidleyReport)

  • His wording in the speech clearly indicates government spending, remember he said "spend all that money at home." And he said this right after referring to the (government) money going toward empire. He rocks, but this doesn't seem like a slip of the tongue. It fits some of his other statements.

    However I'm sorry for the slow responses on this thread; I will try to get a video response up as soon as I can get clear of all this breaking news with the state house, Real ID, etc.

Top Comments

  • Nice way to try and distort and spin Dr Paul's

    words, but it's not going to work for the supporters that arent retarded like yourself!! He's talking about maybe instead of spending a trillion dollars over seas that we could spend that money here!! Your trying to disect it and distort it like the cocksucker you are!! ASSCLOWN!! NICE TRY! JERK!!!

  • He isn't talking about Government spending. He's talking about returning the tax money the Government takes from people to spend overseas, and letting them spend their money (if they choose to) here.

see all

All Comments (130)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The Good doctor has always advocated smaller government with less spending. You would know that by the length you've gone to focus on this.

    Interesting nasal twang you have there!

  • I just left something out from my last post. This guy is a moron and he doesnt know who Ron Paul is

  • i think he means bring the money back to US. Tax cuts is in a way spending

  • this guy doesnt know what hes talking about, right out of the gate he doesnt know a thing about ron paul's philosophy. ron paul is not an anarchist, he is anti-FEDERAL government, not state government. if we move to a state and local government then the people of a particular area will in essence govern themselves because they can make their own laws instead of letting the federal government oppress and strip away liberty

  • I don't think Ron Paul means to spend all that money at home via the government. I think he mean collectively, we'll be richer without going to war, whether that be through tax cuts, or having more government money to spend.

    In the context of everything else he's said, I know Ron Paul is for smaller government and less spending. He wants to abolish the IRS and the Fed. That's the government's checkbook!

  • I think you're taking his words too literally. Many times Ron Paul has said the government should not take care of the people, but should only take care of those who have become dependant on social security, etc.

  • Whoo69, Ron Paul has said our economics policies have created anxiety that we want to blame on immigrants. He's used the exact word you used: "scapegoats." I also am pro-immigration and in a prosperous environment we wouldn't need a scapegoat. Paul is more pro-prosperity than anti-immigration. If we fixed our economy and returned to the Constitution we wouldn't need someone to blame.

  • RR, I think you make some good points and that you are not as anti-Paul as your heading and some of your comments (and comments' comments) suggest. Basically you seem to say, "Don't just cut spending over there, cut wasteful spending here, too." I agree with that. I also agree that this is not Paul's year for two reasons. The country isn't ready and a leader is simply a mirror of the people.

  • Put on our oxygen mask first!!!Or would U have us spend it on Title 1 schools,section 8housing, food stamps, "Dream Act",oh wait we are already doing all that. He said spend the money at home no, wait you would have us borrow $1 million per minute,oh wait we are already doing that too! U are making no sense, in other words u do not know his voting record at all, U are full of nonsense. Do you have any clue where are tax $'s go? Good luck in your search for your presidential "presumptive nominee"

  • Social security money needs more funding too! You can't just switch it off in a day. People WILL get pissed, even if they agree with everything Ron Paul says.

    Doesn't the Army Corps of Engineers need more money to maintain projects too?

    There isn't enough money here anyway, so bringing the money back shouldn't be a problem.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more