Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Mt Sinai is Jabal al Lawz

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
28,497
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 13, 2008

Bob Cornuke and Larry Williams are among those interviewed in this video.
Their website is:

www.baseinstitute.org

Dualism Defended:
First, if theism is true, then physicalism as a worldview is false. God is not a physical being. Second, a number of people have argued that numbers exist and that they are abstract, nonphysical entities (e.g., sets, substances, or properties). Firstly, mathematics claims to give us knowledge. But if this is so, there must be something that mathematics is about. Just as the biologist discovers biological truths about biological objects (organisms), so the mathematician often discovers mathematical truths (he does not invent them all the time) and these truths are about mathematical objects. If one denies the existence of numbers, then it is hard to rescue mathematics as a field which conveys knowledge about something. Without numbers, mathematics becomes merely an internally consistent game which is invented. Without numbers mathematical and scientific knowledge is hard to maintain. But if numbers exist, physicalism as a worldview is false because numbers are not physical entities.

If physicalism is true, it is hard to see what one should make of the existence and nature of theories, meanings, concepts, propositions, the laws of logic, and truth itself. It would seem that theories themselves exist and can be discovered. The laws of logic seem to be real laws that govern the relationships between propositions. Propositions seem to exist and be the content of thoughts which become associated with the physical scratchings of a given langualge called sentences. Sentences may be made of black ink, be on a page, and be four inches long. But it is hard to see how the content of the sentence (i.e. the proposition or thought expressed by the sentence ) could be on the page. Such entities seem to be nonphysical entities which can be in the mind. Truth appears to be a relation of correspondence between a thought and the world. if a thought really describes the world accurately, it is true. It stands to the world in a relation of correspondence. But whatever else one wants to say about the relation of correspondence, it does not seem to be a physical relation like cause and effect.

Universals seem to exist and they are not material. A universal is an entity that can be in more than one place at the same time. Some universals are properties (redness, hardness, triangularity); others are relations (larger than, to the left of). Whatever else one may use to characterize the nature of matter, it is clear that a clump of matter is a particular. A piece of matter cannot be in more than one place at the same time. Physicalists deny the existence of universals at the level of general worldview, because universals are not physical entities.
For example, just because one cannot see the soul, weigh it , or say where it is, it does not follow that the soul does not exist. One cannot see, weigh, or locate numbers or values, but they still exist.

  • likes, 5 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (dingorex)

  • these people are deceivers, and have stolen others research!!

    They did not find any of this but stole these discoveries from:

    Ron Wyatt found it years before these guys ursurped it!!

  • @gregkm You are correct and Larry Williams admitted as much in letters we exchanged in the early 1990s. He and Bob Cornuke only dispute the crossing site that Ron Wyatt (and myself) proposed. David Faisal also has investigated this site along with the late Apollo moonwalker Jim Irwin. Many have sneaked into Saudi Arabia to investigate this site. I say the more the merrier. This evidence needs to be in the back of every Bible in the world.

  • @gregkm I meant I concur with Ron's crossing site theory not that I came up with the notion. Sorry for my confused post.

  • Debunkers and sceptics can not change the fact that Mt. Sinai is Jabal al Lawz. Their saying, 'we still don't know" really means that they knowingly refuse to accept the fact that Ron Wyatt was the first "common person" to utilise the "common sense" method of archaeological discovery - the mother lode of real knowledge which "highly competent professional" archaeologists have yet to discover. Show me another mountain of any height, anywhere else with its granite rock peak burnt to a crisp!

  • Amen, and also the rocks are not volcanic, have a scorched exterior, and a non-blackened inner core. Truly amazing is the Power of the Almighty!

  • Hey, just curious, is that area volcanic or not??? Just curious. I have heard somewhere that Saudi Arabian scientists have declared that the source of extreme heat was about 50 meters above the Mountain ( there is NOTHING above that mountain). I believe this is THE Mountain where God gave to Moses the Ten Commandments

  • @pissedpatriot1776 it is not volcanic as Bob Cornuke revealed on TBNs Praise the Lord show a few years back. The rocks he smuggled out of Saudi were tested in a lab in Southern California and were proved not to be volcanic. His website baseinstitute,dot,org has the vid for purchase and it was on YouTube a few months back unless it was taken down. Thanks for the questions.

see all

All Comments (111)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @againstjebelallawz confirmation. thanks.

  • @AllOtherNamesUsed -Yes, I am. What's your point.

  • @againstjebelallawz Are you not an atheist?

  • @AllOtherNamesUsed -I don't get what you're little diatribe was about here; reason and logic surely exist, and I have used both extensively in my blog rebuttal. My purposes in writing it were to do a complete and fully correct rebuttal, not to underline the Midianite Sinai's (in)complete debunking by my predecessors.

  • @againstjebelallawz Oh yes of course. It's been so debunk so long that you chose to debunk it all over again just in case someone wasn't clear on it. Of course. And don't forget you're just an apeman and the universe has no purpose including all things that spring from it, including the electrochemical reactions in your head: there is no reason, no logic, the universe just IS. Any definition or value projected on anything (incl consensus) is arbitrary and subjective illusion.

  • @AllOtherNamesUsed All of this is debunked on the Against Jebel al-Lawz Wordpress blog.

  • @dingorex The dark rocks were not volcanic, but, rather, of amphibolite. According to Google Earth user Textularia, the granite is younger than the amphibolite, the amphibolite being over 710 million years old.

  • I am from Saudi Arabia and i live in the city of Tabuk which is 200km south east of Jeabal Allawz. I have been to this area . but not to the mountain ... acutely you can go to the mountain but there are some locations that you can't go to . Every year it snows there because of that a lot of people go there.

  • Mt Sinai is Jabal Al Lawz ;)

  • 5:49 Dr. Robert Siblerud quoting Howard Blum, I believe both are wrong, the radar station is actually 8 miles away from Jabel Al lawz

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more