Intel InfoScape Double HD Touchscreen Internet Experience

Inside the Intel booth at the 2010 Consumer Electronics Show, the Internet was displayed in double HD. Running on an Intel Core i7 processor, the touchscreen measures 9x9 feet and vividly displayed in 1920 x 1920 resolution, dynamically pulling in 500 snackable nuggets of information, photos, tweets and blog posts from the Internet.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Intel
• CES
• CES2010
• 2010Core
• Intel Core i7
• Touchscreen
• Life Scape
• HD

[waypastthat]

It's as calming as an internet ocean :)

[kjh2196]

@SuperSupertoaster Screw off AMD fanboy, AMD fail in making processors. And change your ancient Athlon poor ass, doubt you even used a Intel processor before. Intel is better than AMD in almost everything, not being a fanboy but stating facts. And by the way, I think you know nothing in computer & IT. You said you owned a AMD Athlon 64 processor @ 2.00GB? GB?! You fucking retarded? Making such simple careless mistake?! Should be GHz, now STFU and fuck off.

[h4xmode]

unfair

[montavilla]

What is this employee's name?

[NineLivesProductions]

@kjh2196 Lastly, I want to lay down my honest opinion on things.

AMD and ATI both have inexpensive, fully functional, and overclockable processors, which appeal greatly to people who want a lot of bang for buck.

Intel and Nvidia are both barbeques (JK) but seriously, they are good in their own way when it comes to overall performance but just aren't practical unless you make a large yearly sallary and can pull the money out of your ass (no offence to you). Really though, you are knowledgeable.

[NineLivesProductions]

@NineLivesProductions Its good to hear that you at least aren't ignorant. Its true for those who have money to spend that the high end i7's are perfect for any enthusiast but thats not the majority of people. The other thing is, its is actually much less expensive to buy a sub par i7 or a highend AMD processor, and upgrade every 4 years as opposed to blowing $1000 that could very well buy you up to 3 or 4 CPU's in the future when the 1000 dollar one becomes out of date.

[kjh2196]

@NineLivesProductions I admit that I misread his comment wrongly but hey, what makes you think that I have no knowledge in IT? Just because I misread his comment? And spending $1k on a processor is ok for me, good processor will last you longer, you don't have to keep upgrading your processor. I am a enthusiast, thus even little difference in performance is important for me. And 'down syndrome' people wouldn't come to Youtube. And lastly, what you pay is what you get.

[NineLivesProductions]

@kjh2196 Other thing is fuck face that if you'd read you'd be able to comprehend that he was refering to fucking ram.. my god you are so stupid.

"AMD Athlon 64 2.2 GHz @ 2.00 GB"

He said GHz, w/2GB or ram I cannot believe how retarded you are kid. Please don't talk you have no knowledge whatsoever.

Its very true what he stated okay, so please grow up and read, because it seems like more and more people on the internet suffer from down syndrome every time i go onto youtube -_-

[NineLivesProductions]

@kjh2196 Kid, you dont know what you are even talking about, sure Intel may be good at making superior processors, but the fact is that they are WAY too overpriced and not worth it. I mean you cant get a quad core Athlon, with an unlocked multiplier for $50! You can't get that with Intel. I have a quad core Phenom, and Its perfect. It was only $170, if you spend that extra 130 for a decent Intel processor you wouldnt notice a difference. Spending $1000 on an Intel processor isnt practical buddy.

[Itanium153]

What a work of art

[Zoza15]

FUCK ME!!!.. 0_o