6. Who says Repentance or preaching of it will insult God's grace ? Sound doctrine vs Radical grace

"Lawless radical grace" is not the pure grace we normally believe for salvation. Instead it is something that is radically and beautifully preached to give sinners and believers the false impression that Christianity has no more laws and hence it has more 'freedom' and more prosperity for them as compared with the traditional Christianity. Many preachers have started to preach this grace radically or just the radical grace. Peter Youngren, Joseph Prince, Åge Åleskjær ... etc, they preached 'Destined to reign' ? no more laws ? no more future sins ? no confession of sins ? Repentance is just believing only ? Repentance has no mentioning of sins ? Paul is a grace preacher, not a repentance preacher ? Cast out the bondwomen means cast out all God's laws ?

Non-believers would receive these messages because they are untrained in Bible knowledge. They are as ignorant as Nicodemus who did not know repentance or the re-birth of their spirit through the dying of self or repentance, commonly known as being born again. Jesus knew that the Pharisees would have difficulty to understand the re-birth or born again experience (John 2:1-21, Matt 3:7-11)

I believe in sound doctrine. One of the ways to promote sound doctrine is to identity any radical or controversial doctrine. It should be followed by an honest and open discussion of it without hypocrisy. Hence, genuine short comments on the title are welcomed, if possible with supporting Bible references please.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Radical
• grace