Sovereignty Under 10th Amendment
Top Comments
All Comments (49)
-
Great video! Helped with my own project a lot. Hey what was the song you used? It was eerie but perfect!
-
It's amazing to me how many people complaining about how this bill or that law is unconstitutional because of the tenth amendment when the bill or law they are complaining about is one specifically alluded to in the constitution.
-
Exactly. I'm not in favor of authoritarianism and conformism, but in absence of wartime propaganda, Hitler's Germany and German youth organizations were no more evil than Commie-wannabe Roosevelt's America and the Boy Scouts.
Why not reference organizations which actually were supported by an evil system? For example, the Soviet Komsomol or Young Pioneers.
(And BTW, Hitler fought steadfastly against the Christian-murdering Commies; Roosevelt allied with them.)
-
Ultimately the Common or Natural Law is the root of all law. The State and then the federal Constitution was created by natural law and enforced by individual free acceptance and action to establish it as the law of the land.
A tree may not pull it's self up by it's roots and prosper and thus the fed may not cut out the state from between the fed and the source of authority.
And the States may not cut out the individual from between the State and the source of authority which is from god, to man
-
Don't forget the third sovereign in the 10th amendment...the individual, who (under god) is the aboriginal source of all authority and to whom all authority stripped from the fed or state by the 10th amendment ultimately returns.
The state is not exclusively sovereign either. It may not go beyond the US constitution or subsequently the state constitution which must not conflict the US constitution which is the highest law in the land.
-
support I 1068 in washington state
-
Florida has such a bill in the committee on Ways and Means. S1240.
Glad to see that my state is in the process of passing it which seems very likely at the moment. It already passed several committees!
-
The way liberals kill debate is limiting it to republicans/democrats dialectics
-
I would love to get rid of all of them. That's not a reality. Those two parties are too strong. In my mind, ut's one or the other. I'll go with the Repubs.
We the People of the united States of America, seek to return to a state of liberty, as a Republic of States. We were never meant to be a Federalist led Democracy.
ShootBlueHelmets 2 years ago 11
Shared far and wide. Proud that my state rep introduced the bill here in Michigan (and he lives just a mile or so from me).
RodneyHampton 2 years ago 10