Crusoe, Morality, and Axiomatic Libertarianism
Loading...
Uploaded by Nielsio on Nov 20, 2011
More videos on morality at: http://vforvoluntary.com/morality
The article that goes along with this video: http://nielsio.tumblr.com/post/12618682679/crusoe-morality-and-axiomatic-libe...
http://www.reddit.com/r/vforvoluntary/
http://www.reddit.com/r/austrian_economics/
Image sources:
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bestand:Carrack_1565.jpg
Public domain
http://www.flickr.com/photos/keithroper/5185262341/in/photostream/
CC BY 2.0
http://www.flickr.com/photos/spicuzza/4661202721/in/photostream/
CC BY-SA 2.0
http://www.flickr.com/photos/navin75/87137402/in/photostream/
CC BY-SA 2.0
http://www.flickr.com/photos/annkempster/6288735552/in/photostream/
CC BY-SA 2.0
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:HumanEmbryogenesis.svg
CC BY-SA 3.0
http://www.flickr.com/photos/criminalintent/3215765729/in/photostream/
CC BY-SA 2.0
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lrargerich/3468838566/in/photostream/
CC BY 2.0
Audio sources:
Zero-project - Ocean trip
CC BY-SA 3.0
Zero-project - e-world
CC BY-SA 3.0
http://www.jamendo.com/en/album/85671
- 29 likes, 2 dislikes
-
Link to this comment:
Top Comments
All Comments (5)
-
@gekkonomics if inheritance doesnt exist, then if the person sells it and gives the money to his/her children/relatives then it would be kinda the same, of course, maybe the children or relatives wastes the money so if the person transferred the property rights then it's more "safe".
-
@gekkonomics exactly.
-
Why do property rights outlive the individual that claims them? Surely if the individual claiming ownership dies then their property becomes unowned. Inheritance is a cultural norm, and as such I would think is simply an application of property rights. The individual could transfer ownership of any appropriate property before death. Simply assuming inheritance gives homesteading advantage to a preferred group.
- 1:15:29
The Morality of Capitalism (by Jeffrey Tucker)by Nielsio1,502 views
- 3:03
There is no axiomatic proof of property rightsby bitbutter1,030 views
- 19:29
On Morality and Utility (by Daniel James Sanchez)by Nielsio546 views
- 2:53
SYL - Devourby UltimateMetalEver17,303 views
- 10:13
Crusoe Economics and the Introduction of Moneyby zeo285302 views
- 8:13
The Implications of Human Action: Diminishing Marginal Utility and Supply-and-Demand Curvesby tumbleweedjoe1,563 views
- 4:12
Criticizing Bad Libertarian Arguments, Part 1: The Self-Ownership Axiomby GuardofLiberty539 views
- 18:35
Walter Block Interview with Dr. Bob Lawson, Part 2by DrWalterBlock197 views
- 2:13
Is there a modern example of libertarianism at its best?by ReasonTV6,579 views
- 13:20
Greece on the Edge of Reason - And When Will People Admit That Libertarians Were Right?by stefbot8,658 views
- 3:14
Tales Of Resistance!by TheAmazingAtheist87,471 views
- 1:01
Libertarians are Cluelessby Poderosa2035,932 views
- 40:46
A Critique Of Rothbardian Ethics ('natural rights')by Nielsio779 views
- 0:18
The most libertarian thing said on star trekby bovinespongiformflu29,525 views
- 10:21
A Critique Of Hoppean Ethics ('argumentation ethics')by Nielsio499 views
- 4:10
Individualism ≠ Isolationismby JacobSpinney1,160 views
- 10:49
Joe Rogan - What Is Realityby TheParadigmShift280,021 views
- 3:46
Adam Lambert - Whataya Want From Meby AdamLambertVEVO27,173,910 views
- 2:17
Cairo clashes video: Egypt riot cops fire tear gas, rubber bulletsby RussiaToday48,089 views
- 6:02
Stefan Molyneux: Bohemian Groveby AdamVsTheManRT4,227 views
Excellent video. You've done a good job explaining why property rights aren't axiomatic, rather they are emergent norms that serve an end - they aren't the end themselves. This is something all libertarians should be very familiar with, because it's a point of contention that statists have with voluntary society... that property rights (as they see them) can be too "strict" in some circumstances.
SpykerSpeed 3 months ago 6
Also, how does one qualify 'use' of land? It is perfectly possible that what others perceive to be lack of use is not. I may choose to use my land as a nature reserve, allowing nature to do whatever it will with no interference. Is it correct that after (say) two decades I am at risk of having it appropriated in some way simply because somebody else either didn't recognise (or disapproved of) my use of the land?
gekkonomics 3 months ago