I agree with Richard that we're one and many. Í'm not sure that being one and many is 'far superior' to just being one, because the one doesn't need to become many. The one doesn't change to become many. The one in becoming many simply stays the original one. God in His simplicity does not evolve into complexity. In His virginal oneness there is no ante partum and post partum. You misunderstand the incarnation if don't accept the virgin birth.
He makes sense. I am glad the interviewer brings up the fact that many other teachers of non duality have said there is no self. That everyone is a "no thing."
and here Richard disagrees with that. That there is a private self oneness manifesting in a body mind. As an individual. If one is a no self than it is clearly seen that no one is walking in front of a bus he says.
I agree with Richard that we're one and many. Í'm not sure that being one and many is 'far superior' to just being one, because the one doesn't need to become many. The one doesn't change to become many. The one in becoming many simply stays the original one. God in His simplicity does not evolve into complexity. In His virginal oneness there is no ante partum and post partum. You misunderstand the incarnation if don't accept the virgin birth.
IpsaPaphum 1 year ago
Ah, makes my heart sing! :)
cattis333 2 years ago
He makes sense. I am glad the interviewer brings up the fact that many other teachers of non duality have said there is no self. That everyone is a "no thing."
and here Richard disagrees with that. That there is a private self oneness manifesting in a body mind. As an individual. If one is a no self than it is clearly seen that no one is walking in front of a bus he says.
gmrtrumpet 2 years ago
Truly fantastic, thank you!
bdegress 3 years ago