Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Conservapedia - Did you know?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
7,953
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 20, 2009

Some of the many bizarre assertions made at the fundamentalist Christian blog, Conservapedia.

Conservapedia is renowned for its creation of random facts and insights. To keep track of the latest ramblings and ravings at Conservapedia, visit:
http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/Conservapedia:What_is_going_on_at_CP%3F

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • To be fair, the dinosaurs aren't extinct.

    We call them birds now.

  • YEP, looks like a good place to get bullshit information......kinda like the bible

see all

All Comments (174)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Really, I should have checked those names. It seems conservapedia has long articles about the harm caused by gay people and atheist. But anything else is a wikipedia article, except muslim which oddly enough is pretty small.

  • Conservapedia is my source of learning! Wikipedia is waaay too biased!

  • @PastafariansWON yeah, but no one feels like using old greek numerals

  • Well, it's modest of them to claim it, but there WAS humour before Christianity.

    Before laughing at Christian nonsense, there were other things to laugh at.

  • All I got coming out of this was to wear more black :P

  • i don't press caps for 'h' on hell because i'm to lazy to press shift. - that's all.

  • About their objection to using CE/BCE dates because it doesn't recognise Jesus, I wonder if they're aware that Jesus was actually born in about the year 4 BC/BCE, therefore if they really wanted to reference him they'd call the current year "2015 A.D.", no wait, the numbers we currently use have Hindu/Muslim origins...

  • Sometimes I wish I was never born into a world this crazy :(

  • These are some stupid statements, but none so surprising to be in print as, "People in the past had higher IQ's." Considering that the average IQ is always 100, and numerical IQ's are relative to the average being 100, this is mathematically impossible, even if people HAVE gotten stupider.

  • I needed a good laugh, thanks :D

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more