Tour de France 2003: Sprint Ullrich vs. Armstrong
Top Comments
All Comments (55)
-
Zugedröhnt bis oben auf dem Weg zur Blutwäsche oder neuen Spritze
-
Armstrong never doped, the French were just jealous that he one and not someone French. :P
-
@JamieEmm18 GO LANCE GO JAN
-
You know, it's kinda self-defeating to search for an easy way to win in a difficult sport. Blood doping is not healthy. A more honest way to boost the ability to carry more oxygen is to train at high altitude, or use an oxygen/altitude simulator. I competed briefly, and before a competition I wanted to perform well in, I would spend a week at high elevation, training hard. The High Sierra's, or the Rockies. I never cheated with dope or blood-boosting.
-
Time Bonus! Note also that Jan started his career as a bunch sprinter so he easily whopped Lance.
-
@lycia69 Blood doping is very easily concealed chemically and financially.
-
@ltothekay Ullrich, Armstrong and over half the peloton. It's the truth. If you don't believe it, you are living a lie. Still a very exciting event to watch.
-
The way it should have been more of the time, Ullrich over Armstrong.
-
@JamieEmm18 In 1996 he was caught for amfetamin.
-
the best of all times.. JAN JAN ALLEZ... THE SHOW MAN IS YOU
It was never proven that Ullrich doped. Still, Great Rider, le tour will never be the same without him and Armstrong, also Marco Pantani, great climber, doped, but, most did. R.i.p
JamieEmm18 3 years ago 15
who was the banned doper?
ltothekay 2 years ago 7