Andrew Bostom on Fox News O'Reilly Show 10 May 2006

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
11,928
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 11, 2006

Author of the Legacy of Jihad, Andrew Bostom, debates what Jihad is.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • VIOLENT Verses recorded in Medina which ABROGATE the peacefully Suras recorded prior in Mecca ... made them NULL & VOID!

    Most "moderate" Muslims have never heard of the "DOCTRINE OF ABROGATION!"

    How can an "all-knowing" god makes so often mistakes and abrogate verses? It is like a human who learns how to live!

  • "... SEIZE them and SLAY them wherever ye find them" Q.4:89

    This sura agrogates many of the first peacefully verses/suras.

see all

All Comments (79)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Islam at its core is an evil ideology which has brought only suffering and impoverishment to humanity.

  • MUSLIM LIAR!!!!! Who cares the word "Harb al Muqaddas" or "holy war" as such doesn't appear in Quran! Jihad WAS the word that was used when the context meant "holy war"!!! On the contrary the word "Jihad al Akbar" or the so-called "greater Jihad" is NEVER EVER used in Quran and it is based on one single very very weak hadith and that's why most serious Muslims and scholars when they are not trying to fool infidel audience don't give much if any credence to that phony notion of "inner Jihad"!!

  • as in, the arabs may not know about the history of the romans giving it the name, and the phillistines. but they've said themselves that there are no palestinians and no palestinian nation.. and it's not palestine(meaning it's just a foreign name). It was only ever a name for a region anyway.

  • so was just a foreign name for a region, never for a people. Arabs have said this in the past. An old video of pro arab anti israel Azmi Bishara is on youtube saying it watch?v=P3n5-yG-6dU the arab historian Phillip Hitti saying itin 1946 at a commission of inquiry.. Infact the name was given by the roman emporer Hadrian taken from an old enemy of the jewish people non-semitic sea people, and enemy of the biblical god.Not from the people of the time but a name of a people in the bible

  • The name Palestine was given by the Romans(foreign people), when they took over and destroyed Israel and exiled much of the Jews(Am Yisrael), those known as the people of Israel. Those remaining genetic studies suggest, converted to christianity and in later years to islam. Foreign people called it Palestine on their maps but not the people living there until modern zionism, and the early 20th century. Then the arabs couldn't pronounce P so Filastin.

  • @catothewiser

    "Israel was never a state until the UN creation, either. So what is the difference? There are maps showing the region as "Palestine.". Israel was, Jews(Am Yisrael) have been a sovereign nation in Israel twice already in history. Palestine is a foreign name, the people of that land never considered themselves palestinian or called it palestine until the early 20th century, so post-dates modern Zionism There were many ethnic groups in the ottoman empire but no "palestinians"

  • Nobody is bothered by chinese nationalism. White nationalists or white nationalism, seem to be full of haters, and have a terrible history.. and you'll be heavily opposed by liberals. Even AMREN whose leadership is moderate, has AFAIK, associations with neo nazis.

  • I don't think it should be America, America was not founded with that "dream". But there are lots of European countries around. Somebody need only convince one of those.. People that want to mix can leave it, people that want to stay within and maintain the "white race" can go there. One of your major problems, is white nationalism went as far as exterminating others, terrible racism, so people are wary of it in a way that they are not so wary of black nationalism.

  • @catothewiser

    Founded by white people but no source for it being only -for- white people.The idea of it being for any race color or creed, goes at least as far back as the 15th amendment.I do not have a problem with whites having a state with a birth control program on others.You have trouble because you can't convince people, people are too liberal to accept it. The problem is liberals not jews, and your inability to convince people and take power anywhere democratically for a white state.

  • @boliusb - "What's your source for saying America was founded for white people only?"

    All Founding Fathers were White.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more