Windshear on short landing!
Uploader Comments (onesiteonly)
Top Comments
-
I think you are confusing 'windshear' with 'crosswind'. If there was windshear, the pilots would have executed 'TOGA' (full power take off/go-around) to escape the sudden and potentially fatal change in relative airspeed over the wing.
-
yeah, no windshear here
Video Responses
All Comments (109)
-
that has got to be the CUTEST little 737 EVER! ^^
(Im a plane person what can i say?)
-
@cinkmoot ironically, if you put a fat chick in this video, she'd probably look skinny :p no offense to fat chicks though
-
reverse thrust, spoilers and brakes asap!!!!
-
I like how theirs a crazy crosswind and a cessna is holding short ready to go hahah
-
@onesiteonly short..that landing looked long to me...
-
@onesiteonly actually, i think the 737-100 is shorter.
-
@greatbigdane unless it was increased performance windshear or the change was not very much.
-
That took the crap out of me!
-
damn, 0:30=0:50 looked like a model airplane...
-
Oh i just love norwegian airports, but i've only been at Gardermoen and Værnes!
tama78, I`m afraid not, since the -400 has two overwing exits, and the -500 as you can see in the video, has only one!
onesiteonly 1 year ago
nope its a 300 version
tamagotchi78 1 year ago
@tamagotchi78 Braathens never had the -300, only 500`s/400 and 200`s
onesiteonly 1 year ago
@tamagotchi78 The 500 is actually around 10 inches shorter than the 300. The 500 is the shortest in the 737 family as well.
That being said, Braathens never had the 300, only the 500 and the longer version 400.
onesiteonly 1 year ago
i think the format of this video makes that 737 look short and fat.......i'd think a 200 is that short, not a 500
cinkmoot 3 years ago
The dash 200 has completely diiferent enginges, Pratt % Whitney - very slim engine. This is CFM-56, a more powerful and larger engine.
onesiteonly 2 years ago