Nassim Haramein 4/45

If you are not yet familiar with Nassim Haramein's exciting work, prepare yourself for an exhilarating odyssey into hyperspace and beyond. Haramein, who has spent his lifetime researching fields of physics from quantum theory to relativistic equations and cosmology, will lead you along a fascinating discussion geared to a layman's understanding of the fundamental nature of the universe and creation that includes black holes, gravitational forces, dimensions, and the very structure of space itself - all of which are integral parts of his now-complete Unified Field Theory. Haramein's theory is currently in peer review process for publication in physics journals; however, the presentation does not end with the introduction of his theory alone, but includes the discussion of the path that he took to arrive at his views, which weaves between the texts and monuments of ancient civilizations, biology, chemistry and the primordial role of consciousness - all of which lend further credence to the science behind the theory

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• UFO
• Sighting
• Alien
• Crop
• Circles
• Pyramids
• Unified
• Field
• Theory
• Nassim
• Haramein
• Dimension
• Physics
• Event
• Horizon
• of
• everything
• Sacred
• Geometry
• Relativity
• Albert
• Einstien
• Nicola
• Tesla
• Perfect
• Circle
• sound

[10100003]

Why the hate? He's essentially discussing chaos theory. The scale of it all depends on your current perspective. Check out videos on this site. To say his discussion is meaningless is ridiculous. Steven Hawkins recent BBC series essentially says the same thing, which is the heart of the problem, this guy has gone at it in a now conventional route so he's a 'mystic' etc, If you gave the exact same presentation to Hawkins the comments section would be full of praise. LOL retarded IMO.

[ebmstudios]

I am just curious , if bobathon ET AL are correct , why are they trolling videos on you tube instead of taking their arguments to Nassim himself ? After all it is not like he is not accessible . I've e-mailed and gotten prompt responses myself and I am the epitome of no one . It just seems strange.....

[Nameless1324]

well i suppose its your opinion, and i cant change so ,you know believe what you want to

[Piticli0969]

@Nameless1324 You were the one who said "he says logical things" not me. Laws can't be broken precisely because they are supported by evidence. They can be extended or replaced by another law that comprises smaller ones. When Einstein came up with relativity he didn't break Newton's law, he just extended for special cases. That is call SCIENCE, a heritage of proven laws. This guy comes with a theory that is opposing reality. Sorry, I can't buy that.

[Piticli0969]

@Nameless1324 I disagree. Scientific community is extremely diverse. They love to have their theories/laws challenged with anything that can better explain nature. I'm not a physicist but I believe this guy doesn't get credit simply because is just talking shit. The fact that he runs that "resonance project" money-making machine with "emissary programs" at $3200 tuition fee just reaffirms my opinion.

[Nameless1324]

@Piticli0969 you see you always have to ask exactly WHOS logic these things are based on, i mean we observe something to be finite logical then to assume it has a definite mass, by this guys logic not the case. science also progresses by rejecting old established ideas, if you rely on the knowledge of your forecomers,call them laws, unbrekable laws, and then only apply those laws to make deductions about everything no progress will be made.

[Nameless1324]

@Piticli0969 I think its probably because if he did get any credit then the ''mainstream'' (hate that word) scientists would have rewrite a-lot of their own literature something they don't like doing,

[Piticli0969]

@Nameless1324 Something that seems logical doesn't mean is true. Kepler was convinced that the orbits of the planets followed the five Pythagorean solids boundaries. That seemed logical too, however didn't match observations. He eventually rejected his theory and came up with a new one in agreement with reality. That's how science progresses.

[Piticli0969]

@Nameless1324 Yeah, I agree with you in this one. There are a lot of unconfirmed theories for unexplained things in the Universe (including dark matter). However, any theory is immediately rejected when it contradicts observational evidence. That is my issue on the proton mass. But anyway, assuming he's got a point, why he doesn’t get any credit in the scientific community? Don't tell me all the scientists are narrow-minded.

[Nameless1324]

@Piticli0969 I'm not saying you shouldn't believe what's proven ,what I'm saying is you shouldn't immediately disregard all that is not, and to respond to the scientific conspiracy stuff, I find alot of ''mainstream'' science to be stupid ''we cant prove what's holding our universe together, and if we don't our theories are bullshit and we lose our funding'' ''oh its dark matter, cant see measure or prove it, but its dark matter'' maybe they're corrupt maybe not, doesn't matter its bullshit

[Nameless1324]

@Piticli0969 yes, if you call that outer boundary a proton, and inside that boundary there is an infinite amount of these triangle particles, these particles all have the same mass, then no matter how large or small this mass is, the amount of mass contained inside the boundary is infinite, like he said in his first video there is a certain amount of re-wiring that needs to be done, and at first it seems counter intuitive but eventually you see its just logical

[Piticli0969]

@Nameless1324 Regarding point 2: Okay he is multiplying whatever triangles, so what? Does that mean that the proton has infinite mass again?