NORMAN FINKELSTEIN AT THE UN Part-3

No description available.

Category:

Comedy

Tags:

• NORMAN
• FINKELSTEIN
• AT
• THE
• UN
• Part

[NizarAbboud]

Yes sure, yet not before Monday

[Redcarpet01]

@PRJking That's right, they only applied charges AFTER the report, and previously dismissed ALL allegations. That's hardly something to boast about.

[PRJking]

@quarkmuffin37

huh?

what ever you smoke, let me know about it.

Can you give me one example for a conflict where no innocent civilians were killed?

I can't find any, it is regretful but it happens and it's inevitable.

Hamas thought that they can shot rockets at Israel and Israel would stand still, they were delusional.

As long as these illusions are alive, there will be more destruction and death for both sides.

[quarkmuffin37]

@PRJking Shut your useless lying pie hole. Youre an apologist to black and white crimes against humanity. Try and wrap your mind around that. As Israel kills innocent civilians, unprotected and unarmed, and you stupid fucking christian/zionist thugs stand and cheer them on. Youre the worst humanity has to offer itself, and its such a shame that you climbed out of the abortion bucket.

[PRJking]

@uchihaangelus

The other three members did not retract the report.

So? whats difference does it make? Goldstone still was the head of that mission - a distorted missions who aim was to incriminate Israel.

What pressure has he been through two years after the report was published? he's a judge and he can manage pressure properly.

More important is Goldstone admitting that the UN is blatantly biased against Israel.

[PRJking]

@uchihaangelus

As goldstone stated, Israel did took the heed from the conclusions and charged soldiers who committed crimes.

Hamas didn't do anything of a kind. that means that the next round will involve Israelis taking further precautions while Hamas will use the same strategies and tactics that intentionally puts their own people in harms way and indiscriminately targets Israeli civilians.

(cont)

[PRJking]

@uchihaangelus True, his retraction was partial.

He said that he no longer believes that Israel targeted civilians as a meter of policy, and that's all what counts, civilian casualties have been inevitable on any war.

In fact a research of the ICRC shows that 90% of war casualties since ww2 were civilians.

So which parts goldstone did not retract?

Hamas usage of human shields.

Hamas actions against and from civilian populations.

(Cont)

[uchihaangelus]

@PRJking Actually Goldstone revoked only specific instances and not his entire report. Also note that the other authors and contributors to the report hold true to their words.

Did the pressure finally get to Goldstone ? Only he knows

[PRJking]

Goldston Revoked his report, Norman can hang his gloves and say "I'm Sorry, I've been wrong"

[freenational]

I think this part was badly edited. Important parts of Dr Finkelstein address about the Goldstone report was clipped so we don't get to hear what was actually said.

[samibh100]

thank you 4 the upload