Uploader Comments (d60944)
Top Comments
-
In the manuscript I think Chopin wrote Vivace ma non troppo than crossed in out. Pachmann plays very passionatly, I don't know why these other responders are saying he didn't.
-
One of the best I have ever heard! Wonderful. Thank you very very much for posting. I love it so much.
Video Responses
All Comments (15)
-
I was jumping around listening to some of my favorite recordings of the old pianists such as Pachmann, Plante & ect... for some reason I had to listen to this one twice... it's a really unique performance. Very beautiful playing.
-
@nickus32000 Yes, I do agree with you. It´s also exquisite and really appassionato. The tempo is very good and it´s played with heart. The lyrical way of play is not always . I invite you to listen the video i posted with Guiomar Novaes playing this wonderful Étude. It´s the greatest conception of this masterpiece. Guiomar Novaes, Cortot, Brailowsky, Pachmann. :)
-
Franz Liszt said that this etude should be played "very slowly". Liszt often heard Chopin play his own works. The plot thickens! Chopin's metronome marking is quite fast. Maybe - play as you feel !
-
Spectacularly good!
-
exactly Vivace ma non troppo. Many don´t know that and play it like a slow slow Nocturne. I prefer a more flowing tempo. Also, I prefer Von Sauer´s version.
-
The only genius 'Vladimir' i know is Vladimir Horowitz
-
egads what a butchery of this etude
-
Pachmann makes a cadenza out of this etude, especially the middle part. I don't like it.
I have a strong personal commitment to this work and this makes it difficult to say something nice when you think there is something fundamental lacking.
flugelmaniac 3 years ago
Tell us of the commitment and how you feel it should be approached!
d60944 3 years ago