PC Robot Demo
Loading...
Loading...
13,999
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- 3:04VIA Drives Roboticsby VIAMKT22,878 views
- 1:55Netbook Arduino Robot with Network Controlby CalcProgrammer117,779 views
- 3:05Homemade RC crawler/ spy robotby bmx1994mathisen10,700 views
- 1:27USB to IR Distance Sensor Robot Kit Demoby trossenrobotics11,402 views
- 8:56BotBuilder - cool DIY robots!by BotBuilderUK9,603 views
- 0:27Vinegar robotby trix822,933,315 views
- 4:29Brat Biped Robot Demoby fiurobotics6,220 views
- 1:29Mi robot control por pcby timbadores8,572 views
- 1:13MANOI robot demoby CommunistRobot17,618 views
- 1:04Lynxmotion BRAT based RC Mech Warrior with wifi...by robots78,766 views
- 9:59Arduino + Eee PC Robot final (Road to CiclopEee)by eried27,406 views
- 0:50Dragon Runner Robotby trossenrobotics33,828 views
- 8:00Remote Control Robot Tutorialby palmisano134,491 views
- 5:31Mobile Robot based on ORCS - Open Robotics Cont...by inder6666663,934 views
- 0:16how to make a wifi-controlled robot using an As...by LucaErcoli824,528 views
- 2:01914 PC-BOTby techiediva2,790 views
- 7:31B&D Industrial's ABB Robot Demoby BDTSG1,144 views
- 0:58Lian Li's T1 Spider Mini-ITX PC Case Dancing At...by legitreview10,019 views
- 4:26Computer Vision Controlled Robot ARMby seeprogrammer12,174 views
Digijedi569 4 months ago
Robot wars, anyone?
pontus515 1 year ago
Almost without exception, all current commercial mobile robots are uC.
But as I noted, uC's don't have the processing power to accomplish complex tasks. For that you need PC's, and preferably off-board.
hidemyvid 2 years ago
And if you really want to cut down on power then use PC104. But if your going this route you will cut down on development has much, from my experience PC104 are better than uControllers but they still take up time.
ideled 2 years ago
Not solid state relays i meant to say SOLID STATE DRIVES!!
ideled 2 years ago
I have build several bots, and after a while you will realize that using a pc as a platform for your bot code cuts down on development. Microcontrollers are great for amatures but doesn't fly when you need to rapidly develop a prototype. Although I use LabVIEW, and using a microATX with an intel atom processor along with solid state relays you can really cut down on power. REMEMBER TIME IS MONEY SO THINGS NEED TO BE DONE QUICK. But if this is strictly for fun then do what you want.
ideled 2 years ago
Youtube - how you too can interact with millions of idiots...
All things considered, I'm ready to write this discussion off as "another idiot on youtube".
As a parting query, are you familiar with what it means to develop a "platform"? Specifically that which sets the bar for what a system can and can not do? Just because something comes off the bench controlled by a remote (which could as easily be done with R/C receivers)doesn't mean it doesn't get a camera and SLAM tomorrow.
alynn333333 3 years ago
i think u talk a lot more then you yourself have done .
let's not compare the sizes of our members . i never loose .
aliencurv 3 years ago
I agree, I probably would. I've done development in the microcontroller space for nearly 25 years. More than two dozen patents and hundreds of mil in sales. As a CTO in the embedded space for over a decade pushing the envelope in video compression/decompression on everything from FPGAs to the latest ARMs, I just don't get out much... [roll eyes]
What a platform does today is not what it's intended to do tomorrow. Maybe you should look consider THOSE fundamentals?
alynn333333 3 years ago
yah that sounds like i'd enjoy doing that on a pc . a microcontroller wouldn't be up to that challenge .
but this particular project i commented on is a remote control pc . it's not a robot . and all that could be done with a microcontroller . that's all i'm saying .
i'd like to encourage ppl to get into microcontroller development because it helps with understanding the fundementals .
it appears u'd benefit from it too .
aliencurv 3 years ago