(STS - 51-L) Challenger Explosion - Orbiter 2010 and Live CNN Transmission
Loading...
2,747
Loading...
Uploader Comments (dickunddoof122)
see all
All Comments (10)
-
@dickunddoof122 ah that'll explain it, thanks!
-
@PRSOV After the bottom SRB attachment fitting failed, the SRB rotated into the tank causing structural failure which caused the liquid fuels to burn. (not really an explosion). The SRB's are steel for the most part and more robust. The flight deviation did not cause them to break up like the tank and orbiter. They also have solid fuel. The wind sheer and the deviation from flight was too much for the tank and orbiter.
-
danke
-
Gutes :D
Z.films :D:D
Loading...
The challenger incident needs to have a movie made about it. Maybe more, of a high-end documentary.
xXDEICIDE216Xx 1 month ago
@xXDEICIDE216Xx
well, would be a short movie. i mean there isn´t very much potential. 73 seconds of a shuttle launch and a big boom and then. but anyways, yeah it really would deserves it
dickunddoof122 1 month ago
I don't get why if the SRBs were the problem and what ultimately caused the explosion then why didn't they explode too? NASA had to detonate them.
PRSOV 5 months ago
@PRSOV
the srb gaskets were frozen and instable due to the enorm coldness
when they launched the fire went through the gasket and the little flame that went through that gasket rankled itself like a blowtorch through the outer skin from the external tank
after a few seconds the flame was through the external tank and then it ignited the whole fuel in the tank
the shuttle seperated uncontrolled and as the shuttle pitched the water the astronauts died due to the extreme hard impact greetings
dickunddoof122 5 months ago
i want to cry
potestoniko 6 months ago
@potestoniko
...so dont hold back
this is a real reason to cry!
dickunddoof122 6 months ago