I also checked your channel to see if the parts would all be found there, and found absolutely none of them there. Seems like someone's trying to hide, censor most of this interview, but while failing to do this thoroughly; thank goodness for that.
Seems Youtube/Google is trying to discourage viewing of most of this interview. My initial search turned up two links, as mentioned in my first post for part 1. Part 1 has no number, while the other link ended with 7; but, in the page for no. 7, I noticed a link for parts 3 and 5, and none of the others. So I figured there had to be a part 2 and checked the related links for part 3 and got the rest of the links from there, but not all from part 3. This is the first time I've had this exper.
This is powerful testimony, and extremely incriminating for the police dept, and, very obviously, for much higher levels of govt, for the PD surely wouldn't have acted as it did without heavy pressure from the state govt or at least Feds.
He provides a 9-pg report; and they claim it was (mysteriously) lost and tell him he's to provide only a 1-pg report? COVER-UP! Couldn't be anything else.
Jury verdict? It could only arrive at one ruling; govt cover-up. And "inside job", possibly.
You uploaded 2 videos with the same title on the same date, except one of the titles has a 7 at the end. Is there a difference? If not, then why the two clips? Actually, I got both links from a search of Youtube, using "Tonya Yeakey" for search term, and the tab is still open, so I returned to check it. The clip without a 7 is 10 minutes, while the one ending with a 7 is 4 minutes.
So, what is the 7 supposed to mean. Was it supposed to be a 2, instead?
I also checked your channel to see if the parts would all be found there, and found absolutely none of them there. Seems like someone's trying to hide, censor most of this interview, but while failing to do this thoroughly; thank goodness for that.
mikecorbeil 2 months ago
Seems Youtube/Google is trying to discourage viewing of most of this interview. My initial search turned up two links, as mentioned in my first post for part 1. Part 1 has no number, while the other link ended with 7; but, in the page for no. 7, I noticed a link for parts 3 and 5, and none of the others. So I figured there had to be a part 2 and checked the related links for part 3 and got the rest of the links from there, but not all from part 3. This is the first time I've had this exper.
mikecorbeil 2 months ago
This is powerful testimony, and extremely incriminating for the police dept, and, very obviously, for much higher levels of govt, for the PD surely wouldn't have acted as it did without heavy pressure from the state govt or at least Feds.
He provides a 9-pg report; and they claim it was (mysteriously) lost and tell him he's to provide only a 1-pg report? COVER-UP! Couldn't be anything else.
Jury verdict? It could only arrive at one ruling; govt cover-up. And "inside job", possibly.
mikecorbeil 2 months ago
You uploaded 2 videos with the same title on the same date, except one of the titles has a 7 at the end. Is there a difference? If not, then why the two clips? Actually, I got both links from a search of Youtube, using "Tonya Yeakey" for search term, and the tab is still open, so I returned to check it. The clip without a 7 is 10 minutes, while the one ending with a 7 is 4 minutes.
So, what is the 7 supposed to mean. Was it supposed to be a 2, instead?
mikecorbeil 2 months ago