Is Nuclear Waste Really Waste?
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Uploaded on Dec 15, 2010
Google Tech Talk
December 6, 2010
Presented by Kirk Sorensen
ABSTRACT
An economic analysis of what is in spent nuclear fuel.
As a nuclear reactor fissions heavy metal U235 and Pu239, the atoms are split into two randomly sized pieces. Many of these fission products are unstable and rapidly decay into other products. After nuclear reactor fuel has cooled in a pool of water for a few years, and then sat in dry cask storage for another 10--30 years, what is it made of? Is it dangerous waste that needs to be isolated from humanity for 100,000 years or is it precious material waiting to be partitioned and sold? The answer may surprise you.
Speaker Info:
Kirk Sorensen is chief nuclear technologist at Teledyne Brown Engineering in Huntsville, Alabama. He has been researching the nuclear fuel cycle for many years in connection with a strong interest in thorium as a planetary energy source. He is also a PhD student in nuclear engineering at the University of Tennessee in Knoxville under Dr. Laurence Miller. He runs a blog called "energyfromthorium.com" and is active in the Thorium Energy Alliance (TEA) and the International Thorium Energy Organization (IThEO) and is also a member of the American Nuclear Society (ANS)
-
Category
-
License
Standard YouTube License
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
-
23:53
Born of Nuclear Blast: Russia's Lakes of Mysteryby RTFeatured
147,296
-
1:03:43
The Quantum Conspiracy: What Popularizers of QM Don't Want You to Knowby Google Tech Talks
302,367 views
-
1:22:09
Energy From Thorium: A Nuclear Waste Burning Liquid Salt Thorium Reactorby Google Tech Talks
90,490 views
-
36:02
The Thorium Molten-Salt Reactor: Why Didn't This Happen (and why is now the right time?)by Google Tech Talks
76,944 views
-
59:50
Aim High: Using Thorium Energy to Address Environmental Probby Google Tech Talks
37,202 views
-
0:56
Energy Secretary Chu on Thorium Reactorsby NEINetwork
16,982 views
-
0:49
Catfish in the cooling ponds of Reactor 3&4 (ChNPP)by Volodymyr Shuvayev
66,883 views
-
1:22:09
Energy From Thorium: A Nuclear Waste Burning Liquid Salt Thorium Reactorby EarthsGravitySucks
2,852 views
-
1:10:15
The Place You Must Always Remember to Forget - Nuclear Waste the film.by High Country Cow Punk
7,155 views
-
7:48
LFTR vs Nuclear Waste - Plutonium, americium, curium (transuranics) can be fissioned / disposedby Thorium Remix
11,401 views
-
3:44
Nuclear Waste Disposalby Ashokaline
12,154 views
-
1:17:34
The Origin of the Universe and the Arrow of Timeby GoogleTechTalks
136,293 views
-
55:17
The Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor: What Fusion Wanted To Beby Google Tech Talks
183,759 views
-
32:34
NUCLEAR WASTE: OUT OF CONTROL...ON PURPOSE - Diane D'Ariggoby eon3
4,120 views
-
3:17
Thorium fuel of the future. Safe, abundant, dense. Russia Todayby Rick Maltese
9,401 views
-
1:32:43
Should Google Go Nuclear? Clean, cheap, nuclear power...by GoogleTechTalks
55,804 views
-
25:03
Save the Uranium-233, Explore Space, Save Livesby GoogleTechTalks
12,874 views
-
1:07:16
Liquid Fluoride Reactors: A New Beginning for an Old Ideaby GoogleTechTalks
28,077 views
-
1:18:41
How to Write Clean, Testable Codeby Google Tech Talks
69,329 views
-
40:11
La Pesadilla de los desechos Nucleares (1ªparte).by trufault
18,052 views
- Loading more suggestions...
Top Comments
Roger Maddrell 2 years ago
Strange that the most valuable part of the so-called "waste" is the one so many seem most intent on burying forever. I agree with you, we've created the plutonium and it isn't going to go away in any meaningful time frame, so we're better off permanently 'disposing' of it by using it to generate energy in LFTR in a way that displaces our dependency on fossil fuels. Any comparative costs on current vs fluoride salt reprocessing to access the many valuable products in the so-called waste?
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
OptimusGonzoo 2 years ago
I like how you mentioned thinking with your "NASA mindset". Well, I looked at this with a bit of a "Defense Department" mindset, and if the United States reprocessed our waste, the so called risk of nuclear proliferation from the expansion of our nuclear fleet would be reduced on the basis of having better control over our fuel. Also domestically procured Neodymium would mean we wouldn't have to pay China for it, since they've got that monopoly on rare Earths...
A lot to win, little to lose.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
All Comments (84)
jmdesp 1 month ago
Interesting but unfortunately not formal proof this comes from spent fuel (or that more than demonstration purpose only reprocessing is involved), usually most of those isotopes are generated from research reactors.
According to world-nuclear . org, the purpose of Mayak's reprocessing would be to make fuel for the BN-800 fast reactor. Which implies it's not large scale at this point.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
CrudeDude 2 months ago
"...a high tensile container would protect the payload if the worst was to happen..."
And YOU know this HOW, exactly?
Your idea is laughable at best.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
fradaja 2 months ago
2 disatsers in 136 launches a high tensile container would protect the payload if the worst was to happen,sarcism? is this new to you?
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
YouCubed22 2 months ago
(Sarc Off)
Ill admit, it's a pretty bad situation, best we could hope for is to keep it safe from wayward celestial objects.
(Sarc On)
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
CrudeDude 2 months ago
Yeah. Turn it into glass. Uh huh.
The vitrification plant at Hanford was supposed to do that, but at this time it's YEARS behind schedule and MILLIONS of dollars over budget.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
CrudeDude 2 months ago
Sure. Launch it into space. What a great idea. I'm surprised no one has EVER thought of that.
We'll put it on one of the old Space Shuttles, because we ALL know they NEVER blow up...
(sarc off)
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
LucasFlandria 2 months ago
yeah, damn shame it is too pricy not to mention the risks when the launch goes wrong.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
fradaja 2 months ago
DUMP NUCLEAR WASTE IN SPACE!.........OR SHOOT IT INTO THE SUN
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
chamillionairekid 3 months ago
Hello!
Have you heard about the Avon Fat Furnace?
Maybe it could help you burn off your body fat in a smart, healthy and balanced way - and most important - forever, as it already did for thousands upon thousands of people.
As a favor to you, I examined this to a few other programs, and you know what? Avon Fat Furnace always works much better. You can get on your own why, (simply search in Google for "Avon Fat Furnace").
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
myroseaccount 3 months ago
Can't Eric and Sergey give Kirk a few hundred million to build a LFTR?
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube