Rd4 Storm 30 v Bulldogs 16 (Hls)
Top Comments
All Comments (21)
-
@mangosonic123 it was an obstruction. learn the rules. decoy runners have to run inbetween defenders nto straight into them.
-
@norths8 Head Referee Bill Harrigan with another referee were live on the footy show on Thursday 7/4/11. They discussed this incident live on the air. Bill Harrigan said that the video ref had made a wrong judgement, wrong call and wrong decision and should have awarded it a TRY. Enough said.
-
Lmao at Idris getting smashed.
He is a pretender and will never do anything if he gets picked for origin.
-
@mangosonic123 He cut back in on the inside which wouldn't have been nearly as available if Cronk was still in the defensive line, you'd be right about the ramifications of the decision but it was a fair call in my opinion.
-
melbourne loves doodles
-
can you not put the score in the title?
-
@mangosonic it would still have been a penalty, as a deliberate forward pass and it wasnt a bad descision, as it was never going to be a try
-
its BU11DOGS, stupid dragons, cheater storms and fail broncos
GO DA DOGGIES
WE GOT DIS YEAR
-
dw ppl weve only lost 1 game out of 4
-
@billythekidslater yes you are exactly right. The NRL needs to put a stamp on this rule to avoid discussions like this. Glad we agree...
@mangosonic123 clearly you missed the forward pass to lafai whether or not it was an obstruction it was a forward pass either way cronk was taken out he could of came across to tackle lafai but was on the ground.
billythekidslater 11 months ago 8
video ref blunder.. 1:45 Tim Lafai try was disallowed for obstruction... crap call from the video ref, that was a fair try... and the next set of six storm go over for a try... very crucial point of the game where the dogs would have hit the lead... could of changed the game completely... silly video ref, very bad decision
mangosonic123 11 months ago 3