Jonny Wilkinson - The Perfect 10
Top Comments
All Comments (191)
-
great player coming from a welshman
-
Your a fucking retard. Wilkinsons career is over now. It was injured for 7 Years unable to play after winning the 2003 WRC. He's only started playing again this year for England & he doesn't play more than a half without being subbed.
But anyway back in the day carter had nothing. Nothing on wilkinson.
-
@53to3 ........Carters a far better player than Wilkinson.....it's not even close. Carter is probably the most complete 10 in history......and I'm an Aussie. It's like comparing a Ferrari with Toyota Corolla
-
@SuperJay2cool If you can be in a team widely regarded as the 'best ever' like in 2007 and go out in the semi's to France, then you aren't the best. Wilkinson dragged the 2007 team to the final. Of course the rwc reflects players statuses, because that's when it really matters, that's when you truly have to be at your best because it's the biggest stage in Rugby. NZ=chokers!!
-
@MDCVFIF watch Dan Carter vs Wilkinson in the lions series or carter highlights and wilkinson highlights then you will realize that carter is a better attacking player and all rounder. Ive seen wilkinson injured for a long time too but unlike carter he can comeback from that injury and still play quality top class rugby!!!
-
@MDCVFIF watch carter vs wilkinson in the lions series and watch carters highlights and wilkinsons highlights then you will realize that carters a better attacking player and all rounder. Wilkinson has been injured for a while too and he hasn't got back to his best unlike carter he can comeback from an injury and still play top class quality rugby!!!
-
@SuperJay2cool I've watched Dan Carter break bones in his foot several times. If you think Dan Carter is a better attacking player, then you've never seen Wilkinson play.
-
@MDCVFIF have you watched dan carter play against wilkinson dont be biased towards the fact that wilkinson has won a world cup see their individual talent, who is a better attacking player, who has a better points average a game, who has a better skill level, who always out play the other when they play against each other but off course your gonna be biased because your english. you took about consistency carter has been playing well for years wilkinson only 2003 and thats the truth!!!
-
@MDCVFIF have you even watched dan carter play against wilkinson don''t be biased towards the fact that wiliknson has won a world cup see their individual skill level who has scored more tries, who has set up the most tries who has a better points average a game, who is a better attacking player, better tactical kicker who controls the game better but off course your an english man so off course your gonna be biased!!!
-
@SuperJay2cool I'm an Englishman in NZ right now. Dan Carter is just a name, his kicking can be excellent, but it's rarely as consistent as Jonny's is/was. Consistency gets results, complacency doesn't even make the final.
@hustleboy62 yes iv heard of Dan Carter he is a quality player,but in my opinion his kicking isn't as consistent his defense isn't as good.
I think Dan carter has more pace but that is about it.
There is one other thing Dan carter doesn't have a world cup to his name!
53to3 1 year ago 7
@SuperJay2cool Believe me I'm not naive enough to say that the New Zealanders and Dan Carter aren't fantastic players. If you look I said that the New Zealand team in 2007 were possibly the greatest rugby side ever. My point was that Wilkinson stepped up and won games when it mattered, on the biggest stage, the World Cup. This is where the NZ team usually choke. Isn't coming good when it really matters what greatness is?
TheAlexPrice91 8 months ago 4